Monday, 16 March 2015

Salam mulls Army intelligence chief term extension: report



BEIRUT: Prime Minister Tammam Salam is considering extending the tenure of Lebanese Army Intelligence chief Brig. Gen. Edmond Fadel, which expires March 20, local daily An-Nahar said Tuesday.


It said the idea to extend Fadel’s term for one year was discussed Monday between Salam and Defense Minister Samir Moqbel.


Parliamentary sources in the March 8 and March 14 camps told The Daily Star that a draft law to raise the retirement age of senior officers in the Army and the Internal Security Forces is still in the drawers of the Cabinet’s Secretariat General as it is difficult to present it to the Cabinet for discussion, and subsequently to Parliament’s general assembly for approval, given the political complications facing it and hurdles inside the military institutions.


Free Patriotic Movement leader Michel Aoun has strongly rebuffed plans to extend the terms of Army commander Gen. Jean Kahwagi and ISF chief Maj. Gen. Ibrahim Basbous.


The sources said Aoun’s rejection was part of his pressure on rival political leaders to elect him as president.


As the terms of both Basbous and Kahwagi draw to a close, the government will have to take action on their positions, either to extend the terms or appoint new figures.


Basbous retires on June 5 while Kahwagi retires on Sept. 23.



Advertisement



Obama, 2016 Contenders Deal With Changing Attitudes On Marijuana



Polls shows changing American opinion on marijuana, and it's having an affect on politics.i



Polls shows changing American opinion on marijuana, and it's having an affect on politics. Leon Neal/AFP/Getty Images hide caption



itoggle caption Leon Neal/AFP/Getty Images

Polls shows changing American opinion on marijuana, and it's having an affect on politics.



Polls shows changing American opinion on marijuana, and it's having an affect on politics.


Leon Neal/AFP/Getty Images


The divide between Republicans and Democrats on pot politics is narrowing, President Barack Obama said in an interview Monday.


"What I'm encouraged by is you're starting to see not just liberal Democrats but also some very conservative Republicans recognize this doesn't make sense including sort-of the libertarian wing of the Republican Party," the president said in an interview with Vice News.


During the wide-ranging interview, Obama noted that the American criminal justice system is "so heavily skewed toward cracking down on non-violent drug offenders" and has has had a disproportionate impact on communities of color, as well as taking a huge financial toll on states. But, Obama added, Republicans are beginning to see that cost.


"So we may be able to make some progress on the decriminalization side," Obama said. "At a certain point if enough states end up decriminalizing, then Congress may then reschedule marijuana."


Reclassifying marijuana as what's called a Schedule 2 drug, rather than a Schedule 1 drug is part of a bill being pushed by Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, a Republican weighing a potential White House bid, as well as Democrats Cory Booker of New Jersey and Kirsten Gillibrand of New York.


The unlikely trio of lawmakers unveiled their bill, which would also remove federal prohibitions on medical marijuana in the more than a quarter of states where it's already legal, last week.


"We, as a society, are changing our opinions on restricting people's choices as far as medical treatments," Paul, who has been a vocal critic of the so-called war on drugs, said last week.


"There is every reason to try and give more ease to people in the states who want this — more freedom for states and individuals," Paul added.


Paul's emphasis on states' rights is in line with the Republican belief that the federal government should keep its hands out of local affairs. But this is also a political sweet spot as a majority of Americans back more liberal marijuana laws.


In fact, 51 percent of Americans said they favor legalization of marijuana, according to the most recent Gallup survey. That's part of a decade-long trend more in favor of legalization. In 2004, nearly two-thirds of Americans were against it.



Support for legalization has increased over the last decade, polls have shown.




Support for legalization has increased over the last decade, polls have shown. Gallup hide caption



itoggle caption Gallup


Medical marijuana is currently legal in 23 states and in Washington D.C., and voters in four states and Washington D.C. have approved marijuana for recreational use. But it remains illegal at the federal level.


"Members of Congress tend to be between five to 10 years behind the public on this issue," Dan Riffle, the director of federal policies for the Marijuana Policy Project, said in an interview. "Medical marijuana is more popular in this country than baseball and apple pie, and it's certainly more popular than Congress. What this bill means, and what it shows, is Congress is finally catching up to the public on this issue and recognizes that this is a slam dunk."


While it might not drive the voters that tend to make up the vote in early presidential primary states, it came up at last month's Conservative Political Action Conference.


At the recent gathering, which typically draws droves of young conservative activists to the Washington D.C. area, nearly two-thirds of the 3,000 people who participated in the straw poll said they want to see marijuana legalized for either recreational or medicinal purposes.


At CPAC, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz was asked whether he believed Colorado's recent decision to legalize marijuana was a good idea or bad idea.


Cruz initially responded with a joke.


"I was told Colorado provided the brownies here today," he said.


He added that states have the right to legalize marijuana, despite his personal position on it.


"I actually think this is a great embodiment of what Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis called the laboratories of democracy," Cruz said. "If the citizens of Colorado decide they want to go down that road, that's their prerogative. I don't agree with it, but that's their right."


Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, asked the same question, echoed the same argument.


"I thought it was a bad idea," Bush said, "but states ought to have that right to do it. I would have voted no if I was in Colorado."


On the other side of the aisle, Democrat Hillary Clinton — who most expect to jump into the presidential race – sounded... a lot like Ted Cruz.


"On recreational [marijuana], you know, states are the laboratories of democracy," she told CNN in June. "We have at least two states that are experimenting with that right now. I want to wait and see what the evidence is."


Clinton said she supports medical marijuana for "people who are in extreme medical conditions."



Hezbollah, Future talks on track despite tensions


BEIRUT: The Future Movement and Hezbollah are to hold a new round of talks Wednesday despite renewed tension over the party’s role in Syria, political sources said Monday.


“Future and Hezbollah officials will resume their dialogue Wednesday on the presidential election deadlock and a national strategy to fight terrorism,” a senior March 8 source told The Daily Star.


The two sides began discussing these two key issues at their last meeting earlier this month. Wednesday’s will be the eighth dialogue session held by senior officials from the Future Movement and Hezbollah since December, focusing mainly on defusing Sunni-Shiite tensions stoked by the 4-year-old war in Syria.


However, Wednesday’s session comes against the backdrop of tension between the two rival influential parties, whose strained ties in the past have put the country on edge.


Former Prime Minister Fouad Siniora’s diatribe against Hezbollah drew scathing verbal attacks from MP Mohammad Raad, head of the party’s bloc in Parliament, and other officials, who questioned the benefits of the three-month-old dialogue while Future officials kept up their anti-Hezbollah rhetoric.


“MP Raad’s statement came in response to Fouad Siniora’s exaggerated provocation against Hezbollah and sounded the alarm about the fate of the dialogue,” the March 8 source said. “Raad’s statement reflected Hezbollah’s resentment with Siniora’s speech.”


According to the source, Hezbollah is committed to the rules and objectives of the dialogue with the Future Movement “because it sees that this dialogue is in the interest of the country and the two sides.”


MP Raad implicitly hit back at Siniora Sunday, a day after the head of the parliamentary Future bloc warned that the Lebanese state was no longer able to ensure the continuity of its institutions as a result of Hezbollah’s intervention in Syria.


Raad told the Future Movement to choose between commitment to the dialogue or “let us part ways,” querying the worth of engaging in talks while “evil tongues” continue to attack the resistance and its project. Raad and other Hezbollah officials also scoffed at the March 14 formation of a National Council.


The March 14 coalition Saturday marked 10th anniversary of its founding with the creation of a National Council designed to reassert its multisectarian nature. Announcing the coalition’s political blueprint, Siniora blasted both Iran’s role in the region and Hezbollah’s military involvement in Syria.


“Everyone knows the role of Iran and its regional arms across the Arab world, at the forefront of which is Hezbollah, which is starting wars here and there,” Siniora said, reading the blueprint. “Because of this intervention, Lebanon is no longer safe from this swelling violence. The state is no longer able to ensure the continuity of its institutions and stands incapable of finding solutions.”


Responding to Raad’s veiled threat to withdraw from the dialogue, MP Samir Jisr, one of three senior Future officials representing the movement in the dialogue with Hezbollah, said: “We hope that MP Raad did not act in a haste and made a mistake in his stance.”


He said the Future Movement has not been notified that Hezbollah wanted to walk out of the dialogue.


“There are rules for everything. We have entered into dialogue [with Hezbollah] under rules and through Speaker Nabih Berri,” Jisr told Future TV. “Therefore, walking out of dialogue has its rules and it should be through the same gate. We have not been informed of any walkout from dialogue.”


Berri, the architect of the Future-Hezbollah dialogue, has been hosting talks between the two sides at his residence in Ain al-Tineh. He chaired only the first dialogue session in December and his political aide, Finance Minister Ali Hasan Khalil, has since attended the Future-Hezbollah talks.


In remarks published Monday, Berri criticized Siniora’s anti-Hezbollah speech, saying, “it did not conform with the current climate of dialogue.”


Defusing Sunni-Shiite tensions is the main item on the dialogue agenda, which also includes finding a mechanism to allow the election of a president, boosting efforts to combat terrorism, promoting a new electoral law and energizing stagnant state institutions.


Hezbollah MP Nawwaf Musawi said his party is adamant on pursuing dialogue with the Future Movement.


“We know that some in Lebanon are seeking to disrupt and scuttle the dialogue and prevent us from reaching [positive] results,” Musawi said at a memorial ceremony for a slain Hezbollah fighter in the southern village of Aita Shaab.


“Therefore, we affirm in the face of all those [parties] that we and our partners are committed to continue dialogue and are serious about achieving results that would bring the Lebanese together into a united front against our real enemies,” he said.


Musawi said that Lebanon’s true enemies are the “Zionists” and takfiri organizations. “These two enemies are from the same stone. They meet not only in the battlefield but also in their policies and mentality,” he said.


Separately, the Kataeb Party said Parliament’s regular term, which begins Tuesday, should be used to speed up the election of a new president before lawmakers move to discuss and approve urgent draft laws.


“Parliament’s regular term should be turned into an electoral and later legislative workshop that would firstly and essentially lead to the election of a president, whom by practice, has proved to be more than urgent and essential,” said a statement issued after a meeting of the party’s Political Bureau chaired by party leader Amine Gemayel.



Aoun’s rejection of term extensions tied to presidency


BEIRUT: MP Michel Aoun’s rejection of plans to extend the terms of Army commander Gen. Jean Kahwagi and Internal Security Forces chief Maj. Gen. Ibrahim Basbous is part of his pressure on rival political leaders to elect him as president, according to parliamentary sources in the March 8 and March 14 camps.


“Aoun’s latest stance rejecting the extension of Kahwagi’s and Basbous’ terms comes in the framework of pushing the political parties to be convinced that his election to the presidency seat is the solution to all outstanding problems,” the sources told The Daily Star.


In remarks published by As-Safir newspaper Monday, Aoun said the possible extension of the terms of the Army and ISF chiefs is among matters that cannot be a subject of a compromise or consensus “because there is no room for a compromise between law and exceptions.”


Therefore, the rules call for the appointment of two new officers in the Army and ISF commands when the terms of those currently occupying the posts expire, Aoun was quoted as saying.


Basbous retires on June 5 while Kahwagi retires on Sept. 23.


However, the sources said Aoun’s remarks were in sharp contrast with the information available from most political parties as well as the Cabinet’s main components.


According to the sources, a draft law to raise the retirement age of senior officers in the Army and the ISF is still in the drawers of the Cabinet’s Secretariat General as it is difficult to present it to the Cabinet for discussion, and subsequently to Parliament’s general assembly for approval, given the political complications facing it and hurdles inside the military institutions.


As the terms of both Basbous and Kahwagi draw to a close, the government will have to take action on their positions, either to extend the terms or appoint new figures.


Aoun is fully aware that the appointment of a new Army commander, replacing Kahwagi, under the current circumstances and in the absence of a president is rejected by most political parties, including Hezbollah, which still considers Kahwagi a necessity while the military is engaged in the battle against terrorism, the sources said.


Furthermore, some Big Powers are still relying on the command of the Lebanese Army in the battle against terrorism, they added.


With regard to the ISF chief, the extension of Basbous’ term is considered essential because of the legislative deadlock impeding all state institutions and positions, the sources said. They added that the extension of the ISF chief’s term is the only available means to deal with the situation, pending the election of a president.


According to the sources, the Cabinet’s new decision-making mechanism, which led last week to the appointment of five new members of the Banking Control Commission despite the objections and reservations of six ministers, would no longer allow one minister to obstruct any consensus agreement that might be reached by the Cabinet’s main parties.


The three Kataeb ministers, who met Prime Minister Tammam Salam Monday to discuss with him the Cabinet’s new decision-making mechanism, came out with the impression that the premier was unlikely to change this mechanism, the sources said.


Salam, the sources said, has repeated in front of everyone that the country was going through extraordinary circumstances and therefore extraordinary decisions would have to be made.


Salam said if consensus was reached among the Cabinet parties on any issue, it would be approved, adding that there would be no obstruction of the citizens’ affairs.


The sources said Aoun’s rejection of the extension of Kahwagi’s and Basbous’ terms would not change anything as long as the other political parties upheld their positive stance on the extension.


Aoun’s position will be similar to the stances of the ministers of the Kataeb Party, the Progressive Socialist Party and former President Michel Sleiman, who voiced reservations about the appointment of the Banking Control Commission’s members, though the appointment was finally approved by the Cabinet and those ministers were unable to derail it, the sources said.


Meanwhile, ministerial sources fully ruled out the possibility of a deal between Aoun and the Future Movement whereby Imad Othman, chief of the ISF’s Information Branch, would be appointed new ISF chief, in exchange for appointing Shamel Roukoz, head of the Army Commando Unit, as the new Army commander.


Roukoz, Aoun’s son-in-law, has emerged as a strong candidate to succeed Kahwagi as Army commander.


Aoun, the head of the parliamentary Change and Reform bloc, will stand alone in his opposition to the extension of the terms of the Army commander and the ISF chief, especially after Speaker Nabih Berri said he did not rule out this option, while Aoun’s ally, Marada Movement leader MP Sleiman Frangieh, came out in support of the extension, the sources said.



Hariri-Assad relations always tense: Bassem al-Sabeh


BEIRUT: Driving back to Beirut from a trip to Damascus in 1999, Rafik Hariri waited until he was in Lebanese territory before sharing his thoughts about Bashar Assad, the heir apparent to ailing Syrian President Hafez Assad.


Pulling over to the side of the road after passing the Masnaa crossing, Hariri turned toward his friend and political ally Bassem al-Sabeh and sighed. “God help Syria, it will be governed by a child.”Testifying at the Special Tribunal for Lebanon Monday, Sabeh shared details of Hariri’s relationship with the Syrian regime and its operatives in Lebanon and offered specific insight into the former Prime Minister’s reactions after meeting with members of the Syrian regime.


Sabeh, an editor at As-safir newspaper before becoming an MP and ultimately information minister, was privy to Hariri’s meetings with high-ranking Syrian officials.


The relationship between Hariri and Bashar Assad was strained even before the latter became the president of Syria in 2000, Sabeh testified. He recalled a sense of unease after Hariri left that meeting with Assad in 1999.


“My impression was that things will not be comfortable in the future,” Sabeh told the court.


Another time, in 2003, Hariri went as scheduled to a meeting with Bashar Assad but was surprised to find three military officers present.


“Hariri said to me verbatim, ‘the three men took turns, one after another, each throwing accusations at me ... I felt personally insulted and I felt my country was insulted,’” Sabeh told the court.


Sabeh added that Hariri had found Rustom Ghazaleh, the top Syrian intelligence officer in Lebanon, the most abusive.


“Who are you? You are worth nothing without Syria. You are worth nothing without his excellency President Bashar Assad,” Ghazaleh said, according to Sabeh.


While five Hezbollah members have been charged in absentia with plotting Hariri’s assassination in February 2005, the prosecution has concurrently cast light on the fraught relationship between the former Prime Minister and the Syrian regime. Several prosecution witnesses have testified about the particular hostility Ghazaleh expressed toward Hariri.


Syrian officials suspected, not incorrectly, that Hariri had worked with members of the international community to draft Security Council Resolution 1559, which called for Syria’s withdrawal from Lebanese territory.


At the 2003 meeting, the security officers had accused Hariri of “conspiring against Syria,” Sabeh said.


Later, at a meeting in August 2004, Hariri was explicitly told to submit to Syria’s political vision for Lebanon. According to Sabeh, when Hariri balked at extending President Emile Lahoud’s term, Assad issued a direct order.


“You are not here to give an opinion ... You are here to implement a decision [and] to do what should be done,” Assad said.


The acrimonious meetings with Assad, as well as the attempted murder of Marwan Hamade, signaled “a possible security operation by Bashar Assad or the Syrian regime against Rafik Hariri,” Sabeh added.


Sabeh, a Shiite member of the Future Movement, will continue his testimony at the Special Tribunal for Lebanon Tuesday.



Refugees asked to promise not to work


BEIRUT: Aid organizations have expressed concern over General Security’s new residency renewal measures for Syrian nationals, especially a provision requiring registered refugees to pledge not to work. Aid agencies were informed about the measures, which have not been publicized by General Security, in an internal memorandum circulated earlier this year that went into effect Jan. 5. The document, which was acquired by The Daily Star, lists nine different categories for Syrian nationals to legalize their stay in Lebanon. Notably, it draws a distinction between Syrian nationals registered with the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees and those outside its purview.


Refugees seeking to renew their residencies for this year must provide the General Security with a written pledge not to work, a fee of $200, a copy of their UNHCR registration document, a housing pledge, which typically requires a notarized declaration from a mukhtar who may charge for the service and valid ID.


Other categories of Syrian nationals, who are legally permitted to work, must find a Lebanese sponsor to assume responsibility for them throughout their stay, a housing pledge and the $200 fee.


The required pledge not to work is raising concerns among Syrian refugees, the majority of whom do resort to some form of informal labor to make ends meet.


For George Ghali, a program officer for ALEF-Act for Human Rights, the measures might encourage some Syrians to let go of UNHCR registration. Such a trend would be counterproductive, especially as efforts are ongoing to resettle some refugees elsewhere, he said.


From the outset it would suggest “Lebanon wants to turn its refugees into migrants,” he said.


But a source with the Interior Ministry, which supervises the work of General Security, denied that the measures sought to reduce refugee numbers by obliging them to make the choice between humanitarian aid and working. “On the contrary, I see it [the measures] as facilitating their stay,” the source said.


The pledge helps to distinguish refugees from Syrian migrants, who have worked as laborers in Lebanon for decades, the source said.


“General Security is asking refugees to show their registration card, instead of having to find a local sponsor. This is because we are assuming that those not registered are largely Syrian migrants who have played a significant role in Lebanon’s agricultural sector for a long time,” he said.


“This is an issue we have to think of more in terms of labor opportunities for Syrians. Should refugees have the same privilege to work as migrants? That is a question that no one ministry can answer alone,” the source said.


According to the Norwegian Refugee Council, which is monitoring the implementation of the new measures, Syrian refugees have been able to renew their legal stay, but the rules were not being interpreted universally across localities.


“Which is fair enough because the requirements are complicated,” said Dalia Aranki, manager of NRC’s Information, Counseling and Legal Assistance program. “And because they are not interpreted universally means it’s very difficult to give refugees advice on how to renew their residency.”


Many General Security centers are asking for lease agreements signed between Syrian refugees renting from Lebanese landlords, though this is not a technical requirement according to the memorandum. Templates for pledge agreements have been distributed to General Security centers across the country to ensure uniformity. The pledge not to work is being applied everywhere.


Refugees are finding the renewal process tiring. “It’s difficult for people financially going around collecting documents and having to pay notaries,” Aranki added, on top of having to pay the $200 fee.


“The main concern [reported by refugees to NRC] is having to sign the pledge not to work. Anecdotal evidence suggests that some people are considering whether they want to renew as UNHCR refugees if required to sign it, because they are concerned about what might happen to them if they are subsequently caught working,” Aranki said.


When confronted with the fact that some refugees might opt to forgo UNHCR status as a result of the new measures, the government source replied: “What’s wrong with this? When a Syrian has been here for four years? This allows them access to the labor market.”


The Interior Ministry is still in discussions with the UNHCR over the new regulations. “We are open to basically, not change, but facilitate,” the source said.


The document also provides provisions for Syrian nationals who entered the country illegally, requiring them to pay a fine of $600 and re-enter the country through a legal crossing. An entry ban will be imposed on those who cannot pay the fee upon departure.


The NRC also expressed concern for the onus put on Lebanese citizens to sponsor Syrian nationals. “The Lebanese national is providing a guarantee for the Syrian person ... It opens up the potential for exploitation,” Aranki said.


The new measures are in line with government policy toward Syrian refugees since October 2014, when Prime Minister Tammam Salam’s Cabinet issued a document formally articulating its policy intentions toward refugees, namely, to reduce their numbers, ensure the country’s security and stability and decrease the burden of refugees on Lebanon.



Sleiman’s political group set to meet next month


BEIRUT: Next month will see a new political group join the ranks of Lebanon’s myriad organizations, with the Gathering for the Republic holding its first meeting at the residence of former President Michel Sleiman. Sleiman, who will launch the group at his Yarze residence on April 13 at 10:30 a.m., has already sent out invitations to numerous officials to attend the event, sources close to the former president said.


Sleiman said in February he was preparing an initiative to break the political deadlock in the country after contacting officials and community leaders who have already expressed a readiness to join the new group.


The gathering has no political ambitions to form a party. Rather, Sleiman has described it as a national forum that seeks to cross sectarian and geographical lines to end the 10-month-old presidential vacuum.


The Daily Star obtained a draft document attached to the invitation that detailed the work and objectives of the gathering. According to the document, national consultation is necessary to safeguard the Taif Accord and the constitutional amendments it inspired to protect the country’s top Christian post.


The Taif Accord was signed in Saudi Arabia in October 1989 and ended Lebanon’s 15-year Civil War. The document said the accord and the amendments constitute a safety net that has protected Lebanon from strife for the past 15 years.


According to the document, the events that have tested Lebanon over the years include the 2005 assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, the withdrawal of the Syrian army from Lebanon, the March 8 and March 14 protests that followed, the establishment of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, Israel’s 2006 war against Hezbollah, uprisings in several Arab countries, the Syrian civil war and the current presidential vacuum.


The fact that Lebanon has remained resilient in the face of all these challenges speaks to the effectiveness of the Taif Accord, the document said, and protecting it can be achieved by implementing the 2012 Baabda Declaration, in which both March 8 and March 14 leaders pledged a policy of neutrality in foreign conflicts.


The document also stressed that finding internal solutions for political deadlock by resorting to the Constitution was another way the Taif Accord could be protected. The need to abide by the conclusions of the International Support Group for Lebanon, adopted in 2013 and 2014, was also stressed by the draft.


The ISGL was set up in 2013 to help Lebanon cope with the implications of the brutal Syrian civil war, which began in March 2011.


Amending the Constitution to take into account salient issues – endorsing an electoral law based on proportional representation, involving women and expatriates in government, reducing the age limit for voters to 18 and endorsing a wide administrative decentralization system – is important to protect the country from further discord, the draft said.


Also important is establishing a balanced development plan that touches on social and environmental issues that would involve the private sector alongside the public sector.


The draft put a lot of emphasis on using politics to serve the economy and build a state that focuses on the needs of citizens while being transparent in its functions.


The Gathering of the Republic will include a general body that constitutes 50 to 70 people from different sects and areas. The body is set to meet at least once a month, depending on the need.


An executive council or executive committee will be established and will be comprised of between eight to 12 members from the general body. A secretariat will also be formed and will be expected to include experts, media professionals and administrators who will work under the supervision of the executive council.



Patriarch Rai pushes for diaspora voting rights


Rai: No president and no hope for LU


Maronite Patriarch Beshara Rai condemns the delay in electing a president and the gridlock over the education dossier,...



War Criminals Next Door: Immigration Division Brings Violators To Justice



Gen. Carlos Eugenio Vides Casanova, shown in undated photo, is alleged to have presided over human rights violations in that country, including the murders of four Americans in 1980.i



Gen. Carlos Eugenio Vides Casanova, shown in undated photo, is alleged to have presided over human rights violations in that country, including the murders of four Americans in 1980. AP hide caption



itoggle caption AP

Gen. Carlos Eugenio Vides Casanova, shown in undated photo, is alleged to have presided over human rights violations in that country, including the murders of four Americans in 1980.



Gen. Carlos Eugenio Vides Casanova, shown in undated photo, is alleged to have presided over human rights violations in that country, including the murders of four Americans in 1980.


AP


An appeals panel in Florida has upheld a deportation order against a former defense minister of El Salvador, who is alleged to have presided over human rights violations in that country, including the murders of four American churchwomen in 1980. General Carlos Eugenio Vides Casanova was allowed to retire in the US in 1989. Now, a little known unit of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is trying to expel him as well as others charged with human rights abuses.


In 1980, Ann Schneider was a young school girl in Nebraska, and remembers learning about the killings of three nuns and a missionary worker during El Salvador's civil war. At the time, she says she was in fourth grade at a Catholic school run by nuns. Schneider says the class talked about the case and the women — Ita Ford, Maura Clarke, and Dorothy Kazel who were nuns, and Jean Donovan a lay missionary.


Schneider is now a historian with the Human Rights Violators and War Crimes unit of ICE. She is one of about 30 investigators, lawyers and researchers, who, along with a handful of FBI agents, track down suspected human rights abusers, such as Vides Casanova.


Schneider says "to contribute in some capacity to justice in these cases was very humbling, and to do so as part of the work of the U.S. government ... there was a weight and an importance to that that just sort of sits with us all the time."


The unit has arrested or deported human rights violators from the Balkans, Guatemala, Rwanda and elsewhere. Last year it won a case against an Ethiopian man living in Denver, who was accused of torture during what's known in Ethiopia as the Red Terror of the 1970's.


Mark Shaffer, chief of the unit, says in the Denver case, it was a member of the city's Ethiopian community who tipped them off. "This guy was identified by a woman who recognized him as the person who had tortured her and he had no idea but she absolutely recognized him."


"That's exactly why we do this work," says Lisa Koven, chief of the human rights law section. "That's our worst case scenario. Because we take the sanctity of this immigration system very seriously, that's why we're all here."


In recent years, Congress has passed legislation making it illegal for human rights violators to enter or live in the country. But Koven says its necessary to go after some violators on more tangential reasons, such as with the Ethiopian man, Kefelegn Alemu Worku, who was convicted of lying about his real identity.


"A lot of these atrocities and conflicts occurred well before these laws were on the books so sometimes what we end up doing here is going for an immigration route. Inside the building we like to call it the Al Capone theory." Koven says "if you have committed these crimes we will find a way to hold you accountable."


Capone was a notorious gangster who was convicted and imprisoned on tax evasion charges.


One tool increasingly being used by the Human Rights unit to track violators is social media. ICE National Program Manager Frank Hunter says more and more, evidence of human rights abuses can be found posted on the internet. Hunter says the explosion of social media over the years "went even into the remote parts of Africa, where it seems like everybody had a cell phone, everybody was out there taking photographs of these incidents that were occurring."


Hunter and his team are building a data base of videos and photographs as a way to identify violators and prevent them from entering the country, part of their work to ensure the U.S. is not a safe haven for human rights abusers.



I'm Mike Huckabee, And I Approve This ... Infomercial?



In an infomercial for Barton Publishing's Diabetes Solution Kit Huckabee says he knows diabetes can be reversed "because I did it and today, you can too."i



In an infomercial for Barton Publishing's Diabetes Solution Kit Huckabee says he knows diabetes can be reversed "because I did it and today, you can too." Getty Images hide caption



itoggle caption Getty Images

In an infomercial for Barton Publishing's Diabetes Solution Kit Huckabee says he knows diabetes can be reversed "because I did it and today, you can too."



In an infomercial for Barton Publishing's Diabetes Solution Kit Huckabee says he knows diabetes can be reversed "because I did it and today, you can too."


Getty Images


Mike Huckabee has always had the reputation as a candidate who does things outside the box.


But he is now the face of the Diabetes Solution Kit, a $20 quasi-medical product that claims to reverse diabetes for good through lifestyle changes, and without the use of drugs.


If you've watched television past midnight lately, the tone of the 36-minute product video, which begins with a message from Huckabee, is about as infomercial as it gets.


"Let me tell you that diabetes can be reversed. I should know, because I did it and today, you can too," Huckabee says, referring to his 110-pound weight loss that he said got his own blood sugar under control.


"Prescription drugs aren't going to cure you," Huckabee continues. "They're only going to keep you a loyal, pill-popping, finger-pricking, insulin-shooting customer, so big Pharma and the mainstream medical community can rake in over $100 billion a year annually."



Former Gov. Mike Huckabee's ad for the Diabetes Solution Kit.i



Former Gov. Mike Huckabee's ad for the Diabetes Solution Kit. YouTube hide caption



itoggle caption YouTube

Former Gov. Mike Huckabee's ad for the Diabetes Solution Kit.



Former Gov. Mike Huckabee's ad for the Diabetes Solution Kit.


YouTube


The product's website displays a photo of iced cinnamon rolls with the caption: "Discover which key ingredient in these pastries has the power to control your blood sugar fast."


Hint: The company contends that it's cinnamon. That claim, however, is not supported by the American Diabetes Association.


"It is best to get vitamins and minerals from the foods you eat," the association writes on its website. "In fact, research has not been able to prove that dietary or herbal supplements (including omega-3 supplements, cinnamon, and other herbs) help to manage diabetes."


Huckabee's spokeswoman, Alice Stewart, told The New York Times that he no longer has a relationship with Barton Publishing, the company behind the kit. She said the video "was something created several months ago, back in 2014, but due to possible future plans, they have concluded the relationship."


Huckabee is no stranger to out-of-the-box videos. In 2012, some of his supporters released a movie trailer-style ad titled, "It's A Marathon" and set to "Eye of the Tiger." It's a montage that shows Huckabee running races and opens with, "In 2012, one man will take back the White House for faith, family and freedom." During his 2008 presidential campaign, he cut ads with actor Chuck Norris.


But the infomercial, which is not related to a campaign or political party, has again raised questions about just how serious Huckabee is about running for president.


Unlike other potential 2016 candidates, Huckabee skipped the Conservative Political Action Conference, better known as CPAC. And while others are crisscrossing the country – from Iowa to New Hampshire and soon South Carolina – meeting with voters and hiring activists, Huckabee – the 2008 Iowa caucuses winner – is traveling mixing in events to sell his book.


In addition to this diabetes ad, he has also gotten attention in the last several months for stories about his $3 million beachfront home in Florida and the approval of permits to build it – a far cry from image of a humble former Arkansas governor he built in the 2008 campaign.



New Hampshire Visit Offers Glimpse Into Possible Walker, Bush Rivalry



Audio for this story from All Things Considered will be available at approximately 7:00 p.m. ET.





The two likely Republican presidential front-runners, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, visited New Hampshire this weekend. Though neither has officially declared their candidacy, they're giving political reporters a lot to talk about.




Copyright © 2015 NPR. For personal, noncommercial use only. See Terms of Use. For other uses, prior permission required.


Copyright © 2015 NPR. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to NPR. This transcript is provided for personal, noncommercial use only, pursuant to our Terms of Use. Any other use requires NPR's prior permission. Visit our permissions page for further information.


NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR's programming is the audio.



Letters: Hillary Clinton's History With Privacy



Audio for this story from All Things Considered will be available at approximately 7:00 p.m. ET.





NPR's Melissa Block and Don Gonyea share letters from listeners about the story last week on Hillary Clinton's history with privacy. Listeners wondered why NPR's Tamara Keith mentioned that Clinton's dress was pink when she spoke at a press conference in 1994.




Copyright © 2015 NPR. For personal, noncommercial use only. See Terms of Use. For other uses, prior permission required.


Copyright © 2015 NPR. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to NPR. This transcript is provided for personal, noncommercial use only, pursuant to our Terms of Use. Any other use requires NPR's prior permission. Visit our permissions page for further information.


NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR's programming is the audio.



As Nuclear Talks Resume, Iranian Negoitators Consider Republican Letter



Audio for this story from All Things Considered will be available at approximately 7:00 p.m. ET.





U.S. officials say that during nuclear talks, Iranian negotiators discussed the controversial letter Senate Republicans sent to Iran last week.




Copyright © 2015 NPR. For personal, noncommercial use only. See Terms of Use. For other uses, prior permission required.


Copyright © 2015 NPR. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to NPR. This transcript is provided for personal, noncommercial use only, pursuant to our Terms of Use. Any other use requires NPR's prior permission. Visit our permissions page for further information.


NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR's programming is the audio.



Missed Abortion Language Tangles Senate's Trafficking Bill



Audio for this story from All Things Considered will be available at approximately 7:00 p.m. ET.






Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell says he won't let the chamber vote on Loretta Lynch — the nominee to become the next attorney general — until the Senate passes its human trafficking bill.i



Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell says he won't let the chamber vote on Loretta Lynch — the nominee to become the next attorney general — until the Senate passes its human trafficking bill. Mark Wilson/Getty Images hide caption



itoggle caption Mark Wilson/Getty Images

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell says he won't let the chamber vote on Loretta Lynch — the nominee to become the next attorney general — until the Senate passes its human trafficking bill.



Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell says he won't let the chamber vote on Loretta Lynch — the nominee to become the next attorney general — until the Senate passes its human trafficking bill.


Mark Wilson/Getty Images


A once widely-supported Senate bill that would create a victims' fund for human trafficking victims has hit a snag over language Democrats say they didn't know was in the bill — a provision that would bar funds collected under the measure from being used to pay for abortions. And the impasse over that language now threatens to delay other Senate business, like confirming a new attorney general.


The bill would create a "Domestic Trafficking Victims' Fund" — a restitution fund for victims collected through fines on people convicted of trafficking crimes. The measure was unanimously approved by the Judiciary Committee last month, and it was one of those few bills expected to glide seamlessly through the Senate with wide partisan support this year.


Republicans point out that the language was in the bill since mid-January when the bill was introduced. But Democrats say the other side never brought the language to their attention when they specifically asked for a summary of changes between this bill and last year's version.


And on top of that, Democrats point out, the abortion language isn't that obvious if you actually read the 68-page bill. What this bill says, on pages 50-51, is that the victims' fund is to be subject to all the limitations on funds, as detailed in last December's spending bill:


So then you have to go to page 405, section 507 of last December's appropriations bill to find the language:


To be sure, even Democratic staffers say they should have caught the language. But they contend it's a stretch to argue the abortion provision was, as Republican Sen. John Cornyn put it, "as plain as the nose on your face."


The provision at issue is called the Hyde Amendment. It bars taxpayer money from being used for abortions — except in cases of rape or incest, or if the mother's life is at risk. Republican senators point out it's already been the law of the land for years. But Democrats say what's different in this case is that the Hyde Amendment is now reaching legislation that isn't an appropriations bill. The victims' fund that would be created under the legislation is simply "taxpayers' money." It is money collected from people who've broken the law.


While this standoff persists, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell says he won't let the chamber vote on Loretta Lynch — the nominee to become the next attorney general — until the Senate passes this human trafficking bill.



Hezbollah and Iran excluded from US terror report


BEIRUT: The U.S. has omitted Iran and Hezbollah from its list of terror threats, according to an annual security assessment published by the Times of Israel Monday.


The unclassified report, titled ‘Worldwide Threat Assessment of the US Intelligence Community’ was presented to the U.S. Senate by James Clapper, the director of National Intelligence on February 26.


The report has excluded Iran and Hezbollah from its list of terror threats to U.S. interests, after both had been included as threats in previous years.


In a 2014 report the National Intelligence director said that Iran and Hezbollah continue to directly threaten the interests of U.S. allies. The report claimed that Hezbollah had increased its “global terrorist activity.”


In the latest report, the terrorism section focuses exclusively on the rise of militant groups like ISIS and The Nusra Front.


“Sunni violent extremists are gaining momentum and the number of Sunni violent extremist groups, members, and safe havens is greater than at any other point in history,” read the report. “These groups challenge local and regional governance and threaten US allies, partners, and interests.”


Hezbollah, labeled as a terrorist organization by both the U.S. and the European Union, was mentioned once.


“Sunni extremists are trying to establish networks in Lebanon and have increased attacks against Lebanese army and Hezbollah positions along the Lebanese-Syrian border,” the report said. Hezbollah and the U.S. have become de-facto allies in Syria, with the common objective of combating ISIS and preventing its spread into Lebanon.


In a rare interview with the New York Times Last September, Hezbollah’s newly appointed public relations chief, Mohammed Afif, implicitly acknowledged the rise of an indirect coordination in the fight against terror between the party and Washington, though their broader goals and views sharply diverge.


“All have an interest to keep the peace” in Lebanon, Afifi told the NYT, but added that each had its own ways to combat their common enemy.


The U.S. paper suggested that American intelligence had indirectly shared information with Hezbollah that helped the party stop suicide attacks in its stronghold in the southern suburb of Beirut.


Meanwhile, The United States and Iran are getting closer to a political deal that would set the stage for a landmark nuclear agreement.


The sides have twice extended the talks on a long-term accord. They signed an interim deal in November 2013 that gave Iran limited sanctions relief in exchange for some limitations on sensitive nuclear work.



Asked and Answered: Matthew's Letter to the President

This post marks the beginning of a new series, in which we'll periodically feature an exchange between the President and an American who wrote him. Check back soon for more — and if you'd like to write the President yourself, you can do so here.


Every day, the President reads 10 letters from constituents all across the country. Sometimes, he chooses to respond to a letter personally. Matthew's was one of those letters.


Matthew, a varsity basketball player at South Gate High School in South Central Los Angeles, wrote the President to tell him about an away-game at a high school in Beverly Hills. He and his teammates caught a glimpse of a classroom full of iPads and other tools for the students to use, and were struck by the lack of resources at their own school.


"I really feel that school supplies such as computers, classrooms, even pencil and paper, should be equally distributed to all schools, no matter the district or location."


This is what Matthew wrote to the President:


Read Matthew's letter to the President




Select to read a transcription of the letter:







My name is Matthew Tyrone Pointer and I am a varsity basketball player for South Gate high school, located in South Gate California. This is my first year at South Gate high school. I recently transferred from our town rivals, The South East Jaguars. The reason I transferred was because of basketball. It keeps my grades up and in the long run I know it'll make me a better person as I grow. The basketball program is great here, we go to many gyms located in many different cities and sometimes even in different counties. I can say the most amazing school/gym I visited was Beverly hills high school, when my team and I were walking around the campus looking for the gym, we all happen to notice this one classroom. The reason for that was because the classroom was filled with ipads, for the students of course. All of us basketball players coming from South Gate high school, were very shocked and just amazed. While we were stuck on talking about how we wished we had the supplies these Beverly Hills students have, a Beverly Hills student walked by and looked at us, we were all in our South Gate attire so that led up to him asking us where South Gate was located, we all replied "by South Central, on Firestone and State St." the student had no idea what we had just said but we all understood why. He just proceeded to wherever he was going.



Well now to express the way I feel on being treated unfairly with equal access of school resources/supplies. Schools like Beverly Hills high school and Redondo Union have great electronic resources and pretty neat school supplies, that us lower class schools like South East, South Gate, and Huntington Park don't have.



I dont know if its because we're a minority as a community or maybe because of our location, but I really feel that school supplies such as computers, classrooms, even pencil and paper should be equally distributed to all schools no matter the district or location. What makes those schools like Beverly Hills and Redondo union better than us? Is it the students? I hope you get the point I'm trying to make Mr.Obama, I just want equality within every community and imm only talking about school wise. To some kids, school is the only thing that can help them make it out of where their stuck in. You want change?, well give us a chance and we'll do our part by doing our job in school. I dont really care if l get a response back after writing this letter, as long as somebody hears me out and understands im trying to do better for our community.






read more


Barney Frank's Journey From Closeted To An Openly Gay Member Of Congress



Rep. Barney Frank shows emotion at a ceremony in December 2010 when President Barack Obama signed the "don't ask, don't tell" repeal legislation that would allow gays to serve openly in the military. Frank, who retired in 2012, spent his career fighting for gay rights.i



Rep. Barney Frank shows emotion at a ceremony in December 2010 when President Barack Obama signed the "don't ask, don't tell" repeal legislation that would allow gays to serve openly in the military. Frank, who retired in 2012, spent his career fighting for gay rights. Evan Vucci/AP hide caption



itoggle caption Evan Vucci/AP

Rep. Barney Frank shows emotion at a ceremony in December 2010 when President Barack Obama signed the "don't ask, don't tell" repeal legislation that would allow gays to serve openly in the military. Frank, who retired in 2012, spent his career fighting for gay rights.



Rep. Barney Frank shows emotion at a ceremony in December 2010 when President Barack Obama signed the "don't ask, don't tell" repeal legislation that would allow gays to serve openly in the military. Frank, who retired in 2012, spent his career fighting for gay rights.


Evan Vucci/AP


In 1972, former Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) decided he would run for the state legislature in Massachusetts — but he also explicitly decided to stay in the closet. And as he made this decision, he made a promise to himself to support LGBT rights.


"I could not live with myself if I did not oppose the discrimination," Frank tells Fresh Air's Terry Gross.





Frank

A Life in Politics from the Great Society to Same-Sex Marriage


by Barney Frank



Hardcover, 387 pages | purchase







That year, two organizations asked candidates for the state legislature if they would sponsor a gay rights bill. Frank says he enthusiastically agreed, expecting a senior member to take the lead.


"I was a little afraid of [being out front] because I was 32, unmarried — other people would draw inferences," Frank says.


But Frank was the only member who won who said he'd sponsor the bill, so he did take the lead. Throughout that decade, Frank became an increasingly active and prominent leader of gay rights.


"And I was increasingly depressed by the disparity between my advocating the rights for everybody else and then denying myself any chance to participate in it," he says.


It turns out, Frank not only participated in it, he was an open champion for the latter part of his career. Frank was elected to Congress in 1980 after serving eight years in the Massachusetts legislature. He came out publicly in 1987 — and in 2012 became the first member of Congress to enter into a same-sex marriage.


Frank describes his entry into politics, surviving a political scandal and his fights for LGBT rights in his new memoir, Frank.


Interview Highlights


On whether he resisted a life in politics because he was closeted


I began by being repressed — I evolved into being closeted. This is 1954. 1953 is when I actually first realized I was gay; it was '54 when I focused and said, "Gee, I want to go into politics, but how's that going to work when I'm part of this group [that] people despise?"


... I didn't even know how to meet people. I'm talking about the '50s and the '60s. [And] even putting myself in a position where I would have a chance to meet another man for some kind of serious relationship — I didn't know how to do it. I was intimidated.


On the Defense of Marriage Act


By the time the Defense of Marriage Act came up, which is now 1995, '96, we had made some progress. ... By the '90s, it was not considered respectable to talk about "fags" and "dykes." ... You could be disapproving, but you had to moderate it.



Barney Frank (left) came out of the closet in 1987 when he was in a relationship with Herb Moses (right). They eventually split. In 2012, Frank was the first member of Congress to enter into a same-sex marriage with Jim Ready.i



Barney Frank (left) came out of the closet in 1987 when he was in a relationship with Herb Moses (right). They eventually split. In 2012, Frank was the first member of Congress to enter into a same-sex marriage with Jim Ready. Jon Chase/AP hide caption



itoggle caption Jon Chase/AP

Barney Frank (left) came out of the closet in 1987 when he was in a relationship with Herb Moses (right). They eventually split. In 2012, Frank was the first member of Congress to enter into a same-sex marriage with Jim Ready.



Barney Frank (left) came out of the closet in 1987 when he was in a relationship with Herb Moses (right). They eventually split. In 2012, Frank was the first member of Congress to enter into a same-sex marriage with Jim Ready.


Jon Chase/AP


... There were people who didn't like one of us; the notion of two of us getting together and being happy was geometrically worse. But they couldn't come out and say that — it was not, at that time, acceptable [or] respectable to say, "We don't like those people and we don't want them hanging out with each other and being happy."


So [those who opposed gay rights] came up with this notion, and that's why it's called the Defense of Marriage Act. To be intellectually honest it should have been "We Don't Want Those People To Be Able To Get Together Act." But they had to come up with supposed negative social consequences.


One of the reasons we were able to win this battle was ... because once Massachusetts broke the logjam and started same-sex marriage, it became undeniably clear that there were no adverse consequences. So [opponents] had built their arguments on a false premise. ...


In a debate on the Defense of Marriage Act, I got on the floor and said, "I want to understand: How does the fact that I love another man hurt your marriage? What about my relations, voluntary relations with another guy in any way jeopardize your marriage?" I said, "I'll yield to any member of the House who wants to explain to me how what I would do would hurt your marriage."




"The best humor is offered up by the stupidity of your opponents."





And one guy got up, Steve Largent from Oklahoma, and he said, "Well, I'll tell the gentleman this: No, it doesn't hurt my marriage, it doesn't hurt the marriage of other people here, but it hurts the institution of marriage."


My response was: "Well, it doesn't hurt any individual marriages, but despite that it somehow hurts the institution of marriage? That is an argument of someone who ought to be in an institution." ...


The best humor is offered up by the stupidity of your opponents.


On his relationship with male prostitute Stephen Gobie and the resulting fallout


I first hired [Gobie] to have sex. And then, after a couple of times, he was very intelligent, well spoken. What I later learned was he had been on heroin and had been arrested and had been on probation and he was forced to stay off drugs so he was on his very best behavior when I met him. He was very clever. He clearly understood my emotional state, my sense of emotional and physical frustration and basically he didn't see it as an ongoing sexual relationship; he thought he could get me to accept that we had this really good friendship. ...


Then what happened, frankly, was his probation expired. And he started taking drugs again and he became kind of a jerk again. And by that time I had come out and I had a relationship with Herb [Moses]. ... There was a very small overlap, so once ... I told [Gobie] I didn't need him anymore (that maybe was a little callous), but that the job I was paying him for wasn't going to exist and that was the end of it, he got very angry. And here's where the blackmail came in: His first instinct was to say, "I'll tell everybody you're gay." ...


[My sexual orientation had] been all over the papers in May of '87 so it was a little late for ... that. He couldn't blackmail me. So he brooded about that for a couple of years and then he went to The Washington Times, this very conservative paper ... and told them about our relationship. ... The fact that I had a relationship with a prostitute was of some interest. He then elaborated that and added various charges about [how] I was letting him run a prostitution ring from my apartment.



... This went before the House Ethics Committee and ... they refuted or found no evidence for any of the charges. They did find that I had done two things wrong: I had let him use my privilege to avoid parking tickets when he borrowed my car. (I thought he was doing it to run errands for me, it turned out he was also doing it as part of his prostitution). And, secondly, I had written a letter to the probation officer about him and in the letter I lied and said I had met him at a party. I did not in that instance want to say that I had met him by answering a sex ad. But those are the only two things that were found to be the case, but it still was humiliating for me. ...


I had started seeing him in 1985 and it was in '85, '86 that I finally decided to come out.


That relationship, even as I was maintaining it, I realized it was a bad idea. It was certainly irresponsible for me as a member of congress to risk the causes I cared about by this. ... The one silver lining in that cloud ... was after that became public, some of my friends said, "Oh, now we understand." What I said to them was, "Now you see how depraving this was to me, how it made me behave so irresponsibly — and that's why I had to come out. So I would have the strength to stop doing things like that."


On how things changed after he came out


Apparently, I got nicer and that's helpful. ... My colleagues told me, "You know what? You're easier to get along with now; you're not grumpy as much; you don't snap at people." ... There was kind of a perennial, low-level bad mood because I was going around being mad at myself because of this self-denial and what it did. Now that's not just a matter of poetess, being an effective legislator is helped by being nicer to people. ... You got to be tough and nice.


The best thing I can say is this: Being effective in a legislative body has something in common with trying to be popular in high school. ... There's a lot of personality that goes into it. It's OK to be good at the job, but don't start looking like you feel too superior about it. So what happened was I just became better at the interpersonal aspects of legislating. And legislating is the most interpersonal thing.


On using "political judo" to enhance his likability


My mother, a wonderful woman who became a great advocate later in her life, did enroll me in elocution classes [to help with my thick New Jersey accent] when I was seven or eight. ... It was a well-intended gesture, but it didn't work. In fact, what I learned how to do was kind of a political judo — I think I was able to make an asset out of some of my defects.


For example, I have a hard time dressing well. [My husband] Jim, God bless him, works very hard to keep me in good shape, but in my first campaign somebody wrote an article and said I was wearing an ill-fitting suit. And I said, "No, that's unfair. It was a well-fitting suit — I just wasn't the person it fit."


As a state representative, somebody took a picture of me in which I looked a little disheveled and I put it up and said, "Re-elect Frank: Neatness isn't everything."


So the same with my voice. You become kind of — I think there's a certain blandness that politicians have that does not work to your favor, so if you can be somewhat distinctive in ways that are not offensive, I think that's helpful.


On how "reality defeats prejudice"


We have made so much progress in diminishing homophobia. It was based on a wholly unreal, inaccurate prejudice and people say, "Which tactic, which thing most defeated prejudice?" [It was] the simple act of coming out, by millions of us, because our reality just defeated the prejudice. And instead of being this stereotype with all these negative characteristics, it turned out we were their cousins and brothers and doctors and patients and students and teammates and salespeople et cetera, et cetera.