Tuesday, 7 April 2015

Iran’s president special envoy in Beirut



BEIRUT: Iranian President Hassan Rouhani's special envoy Morteza Sarmadi arrived in Beirut early Wednesday for talks on bilateral relations and to brief Lebanese officials on the outcome of a recent nuclear deal cut between Tehran and the West.


A source at Beirut airport said Sarmadi arrived at dawn. Lebanon is the fifth leg of his tour of regional countries.


Iran’s official news agency IRNA said the Sarmadi is scheduled to hold talks with Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, Prime Minister Tammam Salam and Foreign Minister Gebran Bassil on the ways of expanding mutual relations, regional and global developments, Yemen, and Syria in particular.


Local newspaper An-Nahar said Sarmadi will likely meet Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah.


A political source said Sarmadi – who has visited Oman, Iraq, Tunisia and Algeria – would begin his day by visiting the grave of Imad Moughnieh, the Hezbollah military commander who was killed in a 2008 car bomb in Damascus, Syria.



Advertisement



Beirut security plan to launch end of April



BEIRUT: A long-awaited security plan for Beirut and its southern suburbs will be implemented before the end of April, Interior Minister Nouhad Machnouk said Wednesday.


“The security plan, which has been implemented across many Lebanese areas, will be carried out in the capital Beirut and the southern suburbs before the end of this month,” Machnouk told local daily As-Safir.


He said he will chair a meeting of the Central Security Council on Thursday in order to resolve some outstanding points, including the share of each security institution in the implementation plan.


Machnouk said 14 wanted men, including a kingpin, have been arrested over the past few days strict the Lebanese Army and police took strict security measures along the Beirut airport road.


He said security forces will pursue and arrest other suspects, including two gang leaders.



Advertisement



Chicago Mayor Keeps His Job In Tough Runoff Election



Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel shakes hands at a campaign office Tuesday, as voters gave him a second term. He won a runoff election against Cook County Commissioner Jesus "Chuy" Garcia.i



Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel shakes hands at a campaign office Tuesday, as voters gave him a second term. He won a runoff election against Cook County Commissioner Jesus "Chuy" Garcia. M. Spencer Green/AP hide caption



itoggle caption M. Spencer Green/AP

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel shakes hands at a campaign office Tuesday, as voters gave him a second term. He won a runoff election against Cook County Commissioner Jesus "Chuy" Garcia.



Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel shakes hands at a campaign office Tuesday, as voters gave him a second term. He won a runoff election against Cook County Commissioner Jesus "Chuy" Garcia.


M. Spencer Green/AP


Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel has survived a stiff challenge that forced him into a runoff and the former White House chief of staff has won a second term.


Cook County Commissioner Jesus "Chuy" Garcia, who had made a strong bid to become Chicago's first Latino mayor, has called Emanuel to concede the election and congratulate the mayor.


With 90 percent of precincts reporting, Emanuel had won 56 percent of the vote to Garcia's 44 percent.


Both candidates had framed the city's first-ever runoff election for mayor as one in which the future of Chicago was at stake.


In many ways, the race mirrors a struggle nationally for the future and the identity of the Democratic party between the more moderate, business friendly wing of the party (represented by Emanuel) and the more liberal or progressive wing which some political activists and analysts say is the future of the Democratic party, in Chicago and nationally.


The Chicago Board of Elections says 44 percent of the city's registered voters turned out in this historic runoff. That's up from just 34 percent turnout in the Feb. 24 election, in which Emanuel won just 45 percent of the vote.



Army kills three ISIS militants in pre-emptive border raid


BEIRUT: The Lebanese Army said it killed three ISIS militants and wounded four others in a dawn raid Tuesday on a strategic hill near the border with Syria, in the military’s latest pre-emptive attack against jihadis threatening to destabilize Lebanon. “A Lebanese Army force carried out at dawn today [Tuesday] a lightning and qualitative raid on terrorist groups on the Mkhairimeh hilltop in the highland of the town of Ras Baalbek, killing three terrorists and wounding four after clashing with them using all types of weapons,” the Army said in a statement.


According to the statement, the raid was staged after the military command had received information that “terrorist groups” were preparing logistics for combat operations on the hilltop, which overlooks Wadi Rafeq, where jihadis in the past have attempted to infiltrate Lebanon.


The Army said it also inflicted heavy damage on the militants’ weapons and equipment, including the destruction of two cannons, a number of heavy machine guns and other armored vehicles.


“The Army force returned to its position without suffering any casualties among its ranks,” the statement said.


“This raid comes as part of pre-emptive military operations carried out by Army units to destroy terrorist groups and prevent them from infiltrating to target Army outposts and attack citizens,” it added.


Mkhairimeh is opposite the Al-Jarash hilltop, which the Army seized from militants in a February attack.


A senior military official described the raid as “a very qualitative operation,” saying that Lebanese troops stormed the militants’ hideout on the outskirts of Ras Baalbek.


“The terrorists belong to ISIS. Today’s raid is part of the Army’s ongoing pre-emptive strikes against terrorism,” the official told The Daily Star.


Asked to comment on growing fears that ISIS and Nusra Front militants, entrenched in mountainous caves on the outskirts of the northeastern town of Arsal, were preparing to launch a major offensive against Lebanon when the snow melts, he said: “With snow melting or not, the Army is fully prepared to confront terrorist groups anywhere and at any time.”The policy of pre-emptive strikes was put in place after eight soldiers, including an officer, were killed and 22 others were wounded in fierce clashes with ISIS militants on the outer edge of Ras Baalbek in January.


The Army has frequently clashed with Syria-based militants from ISIS and the Nusra Front. The two groups, which fought Lebanese troops in Arsal last August, are still holding 25 soldiers and policemen hostage after killing four of their captives.


Defense Minister Samir Moqbel met Army commander Gen. Jean Kahwagi with whom he discussed security developments in the country, particularly the Army’s raid on the outskirts of Ras Baalbek, in addition to the military institution’s needs, the National News Agency reported.


The French Defense Ministry had said it would begin shipping $3 billion worth of weapons paid for by Saudi Arabia to the Lebanese Army in April.


Under the deal first announced in 2013, France will supply armored vehicles, warships, attack helicopters, munitions and communication gear to the Lebanese military. The weapons are designed to bolster the Army’s capabilities in the battle against terrorism.


Kahwagi also met at his office in the Defense Ministry in Yarze with Gen. Michael Nagata, commander of special forces in U.S. Central Command, in the presence of U.S. Ambassador to Lebanon David Hale.


Discussions dealt with cooperation between the armies of the two countries, especially the training and equipping of the Lebanese Army’s special regiments, the NNA said.


Negata’s meeting with Kahwagi came a day after U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Antony Blinken vowed continued U.S. military assistance to help the Lebanese Army and security forces in the battle against terrorism.


“We continue to support the security services as they protect and preserve Lebanon’s security, stability, independence and sovereignty on behalf of all Lebanese,” Blinken said in a statement after holding talks with Prime Minister Tammam Salam Monday. “Our security assistance – training, equipment, weapons, and ammunition – totals more than $1 billion over the past nine years.”


Meanwhile, General Security chief Maj. Gen. Abbas Ibrahim said social security was essential for dealing with the threat of terrorism.


“Social security is the compulsory passage to any nonmilitary solution to the issue of terrorism, or any other security issue that leads to instability,” Ibrahim said in an editorial published in the monthly General Security magazine Tuesday.


“It is not enough to tell someone: ‘Beware falling into the abyss of terrorism or surrender to violence.’ You must convince him and help him understand this, and dry up the sources that attract him to this quagmire,” he added.


“Social security and economic security are related and both do not conflict with educational security, which will not be [organized] without a contemporary, realistic and objective writing of Lebanon’s history,” said Ibrahim, whose General Security personnel have thwarted a series of terrorist attacks by staging pre-emptive strikes against extremist cells.


When elements of social security are made available within society, Ibrahim said, “this will lead to calm and peace in relations among the people, and facilitates the security mission of both military and security forces, making them more effective and capable of ensuring stability and civil peace, and of protecting the country.”


“Achieving national security based on strong pillars and foundations begins with building a comprehensive national security strategy ... that would take into consideration contemporary regional and international challenges and threats,” Ibrahim added.



Jumblatt says Iran closing in on Syrian Druze areas


BEIRUT: Members of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard are closing in on Druze areas in Syria, Progressive Socialist Party Leader Walid Jumblatt warned Tuesday, reiterating calls for Lebanon to stand neutral in regional conflicts. “Information shows that thousands of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards reached the Swaida area in Jabal al-Druze or Jabal al-Arab in Syria,” Jumblatt said via Twitter, hinting that this might have drastic repercussions for the minority community in Syria.


“What worries me the most is the fate of Arab Druze in this region,” the Druze leader tweeted, referring to Swaida.


Jumblatt said the presence of the Iranian military in the area demonstrated a clear connection between the Islamic Republic and Hezbollah, both supporting President Bashar Assad’s regime. “It has become a reality that if not for Iran, the Syrian regime would’ve collapsed a long time ago,” Jumblatt added.


Since the Syrian uprising began in 2011, Jumblatt, a vocal critic of the Syrian regime, has called on Syrian Druze to stay neutral in the war.


In his weekly column for Al-Anbaa electronic newspaper, Jumblatt said that a military solution to the crisis would only prolong the war in Syria.


“Since the beginning we disagreed with some of our partners in the country over how to read and analyze the situation in Syria when it was still a peaceful revolution,” Jumblatt said. “We saw the need to meet the people’s rightful and legitimate demands for change and freedom, but we warned against military options that might destroy Syria.”


Jumblatt explained that the opposing factions at that time had asserted that matters would be settled in a short time. “And here is Syria, being destroyed for five years now.”


Jumblatt is a long-time proponent of non-intervention in the Syrian crisis and has criticized Hezbollah’s fighting alongside the Syrian regime.


“From the start we were against any kind of intervention in Syria by any side and on any level,” he said.


Jumblatt also warned against involving Lebanon in conflicts in Iraq and Yemen, arguing that Lebanon always ends up paying the price for such allegiances.


“We think that wisdom, reason and national duty forces us to look out for Lebanese interests,” Jumblatt said.


Lebanon’s internal unity, security and stability should be promoted because the country’s political reality cannot bear any more division, he said.



Rival camps laud Iran nuclear deal


BEIRUT: Parliamentary blocs on both sides of the political spectrum Tuesday praised last week’s framework nuclear agreement reached between Iran and world powers, hoping that the deal would strengthen security and stability in the turbulent region. Meanwhile, a senior political source called for the election of a new president without waiting for the outcome of the Iran nuclear deal or any other regional or international developments.


Asked whether Iran’s deal with world powers over its nuclear program would facilitate the presidential vote, the source told The Daily Star: “So far, nothing has happened in this direction. But a new president must be elected in isolation of any regional or international considerations as U.S. official [Antony] Blinken has hinted during his visit to Lebanon yesterday [Monday].”


However, the Future bloc called for the nuclear deal to be coupled with a change in Iran’s policies in the region, where it has been accused by Arab Gulf states of inciting sectarian tensions and conflicts with its intervention in the internal affairs of regional countries.


“The bloc hopes that Iran’s agreement with the P5+1 states will constitute a step on the road to making the entire Middle East region free of any weapons of mass destruction,” said a statement released after the bloc’s weekly meeting.


The bloc underlined the need for “this agreement on Iran’s nuclear program to be coupled with a change in Iran’s policies in the region, whereby it will stop exporting sectarian strife, unleashing storms of sectarian fanaticism and ending its dreams of empire,” the statement said.


It added that Iran, after the nuclear deal with Western powers, should move toward “exercising a positive and constructive role starting with respecting international legitimacy, international law and the principles of good neighborliness.”


The bloc reiterated its support for the “Decisive Storm” operation, the Saudi-led airstrikes that began on March 26 against Iranian-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen, saying the operation reflected an “Arab will to confront Iran’s expansionist imperial ambitions.”


The bloc implicitly lashed out at Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah for attacking Saudi Arabia and for defending the nuclear deal with the “Great Satan.”


“Great Satan” is a term used by Iran and its allies in Lebanon, mainly Hezbollah, to refer to the United States.


In a TV interview Monday, Nasrallah said the nuclear agreement would bolster Iran’s role in the region and would ward off the specter of a regional war. He also blasted Saudi Arabia’s role in Yemen, saying its military intervention in the impoverished Gulf country was doomed to fail.


“The bloc is surprised that the one [Nasrallah] who has long considered America as the “Great Satan,” and that any agreement with it would be high treason, is today in the position of defending the agreement with the “Great Satan” and has moved to [verbally] attack the Arabs, Arabism and its symbols – on top of which is the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia,” the Future MPs said in their statement.


The Kataeb Party, a long-time critic of Hezbollah and Iran’s role in Lebanon, said the nuclear deal would have “a positive impact on boosting security and stability in the region and the world and strengthening international relations and commitment to the principles of good neighborliness among states.”


A statement issued after a meeting of the party’s political bureau chaired by party leader Amine Gemayel urged the Lebanese “to realize these strategic developments in the region and work so that they can be a factor of peace for Lebanon rather than a new pretext for internal conflicts.”


The Iran nuclear deal was also praised by MP Michel Aoun’s parliamentary Change and Reform bloc.


“The international-Iranian nuclear agreement has made Iran a stabilizing power in the region. This balance is supplementary to stability. This is what Gen. Michel Aoun has referred to,” former Labor Minister Salim Jreissati said in a statement after the bloc’s weekly meeting chaired by Aoun at his residence in Rabieh.


Lebanese Forces MP George Adwan said Iran would expand its influence in the region as a result of its nuclear deal with the West.


“When the sanctions are lifted, Iran will be at ease economically and it will boost its role or intervention in areas where it has been intervening,” Adwan said in an interview with Al-Jadeed TV.


He said the LF, which along with other March 14 parties have opposed a gift from Iran to equip the Lebanese Army because of the U.N. sanctions on Tehran, is now ready to support the military gift “if there are no international risks.”


Meanwhile, the Saudi Ambassador to Lebanon Ali Awad Asiri met with Speaker Nabih Berri in Ain al-Tineh to discuss developments in the region, the National News Agency said. The meeting came amid tension between Hezbollah and Saudi Arabia over the Yemen war after Nasrallah lambasted Riyadh for its military intervention in Yemen.


Separately, Spain’s King Felipe VI called for “peace and harmony” in Lebanon during a visit to Beirut, saying his country remained committed to keeping its UNIFIL troops in southern Lebanon despite the recent death of a Spanish peacekeeper.


“Spain’s commitment to this [peacekeeping] aim is firm and decided,” Felipe said in a speech in Beirut, according to a text in Spanish released by the palace in Spain.


Prime Minister Tammam Salam offered his condolences to the Spanish king over the January death of Cpl. Javier Soria Toledo, 36, who was killed in Israeli shelling.


Salam offered his condolences during a meeting with the king in the Grand Serail two days after a confidential Spanish military report on the death of the peacekeeper said his position was deliberately targeted by Israeli forces.


The premier voiced his gratitude for Spain’s participation in UNIFIL’s mission along Lebanon’s southern border with Israel.


The 10,000-strong UNIFIL force includes some 600 Spanish soldiers and troops from 35 other nations.


Salam lauded efforts undertaken by Spanish peacekeepers, who he said “have succeeded in forging the best of ties with south Lebanon residents.”


A statement released by Salam’s media office said that talks focused on “general issues of interest to the Lebanese government and the Spanish kingdom,” as well as bilateral relations between the two countries.



Three truck drivers back in Lebanon, one still missing


BEIRUT: Three of the Lebanese truck drivers who were kidnapped at the Nassib crossing on the Syrian-Jordanian border arrived in Lebanon Tuesday, while one remains in captivity, a truck owner said. “Three of the four trucks drivers that we couldn’t reach yesterday have now entered Lebanon,” Assem Alam, the associate of Seer al-Dinnieh Mayor Ahmad Alam, told The Daily Star Tuesday. “The fourth is still missing.”


The mayor owns at least eight of the trucks that had been stuck at the Syrian-Jordanian crossing since last Tuesday.


His assistant added that around 25 truckers were waiting at the Masnaa border crossing in east Lebanon for a permit to drive their trucks into the country.


The crossing was taken over by Syrian rebels last Wednesday, one day after it was shut from the Jordanian side over security concerns.


Economy Minister Alain Hakim told NBN TV in an interview Tuesday morning that the kidnappers still held five truck drivers of unknown nationalities at the Nassib crossing.


As for the Lebanese truckers, 14 were released and nine of them already entered Lebanon, he said, adding that 140 others were stuck on the Jordanian side of the border with Saudi Arabia.


His numbers contradicted those of a spokesman from the General Security, which is in charge of border control, who had told The Daily Star that a total of 16 truckers entered Lebanon on April 5 and 6.


He was not available for comment Tuesday.


The numbers mentioned by Hakim had been stated in a report by a local newspaper earlier in the day.


“Up until last night a total of 14 refrigerated truck drivers have been released,” the head of the Refrigerated Trucks Union Omar al-Ali told the local daily. “The fate of about five other truckers is still unknown.”


Ali said more than 120 truck drivers were still stranded at the Jordanian-Saudi border and could not return home due to the closure of the frontier. The number is 140, according to Hakim.


“It’s true that they are in a safe place but they cannot return to Lebanon due to the closure of the Jordanian border,” Ali said.


The truckers had addressed Lebanese authorities Sunday demanding to be transported with their trucks in a ship to Lebanon.


They said their Saudi permits were expiring and the road through Jordan was blocked by developments at the Nassib crossing.



Abra martyr families reject settlement deals


Hamas arrests Salafist sheikh in Gaza over ISIS ties


Gaza's Hamas-run security services arrest a radical Salafist sheikh, accusing him of membership in ISIS, a security...



Minister warns media outlets to abide by laws


Cabinet approves waste treatment plan


The Cabinet finally approved Monday a controversial plan to manage the country’s solid waste after the strategy...



How Congress Can Stop A Nuclear Deal With Iran



Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, will shepherd bills on Congress' reaction to the Iran framework deal struck by President Obama.i



Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, will shepherd bills on Congress' reaction to the Iran framework deal struck by President Obama. J. Scott Applewhite/AP hide caption



itoggle caption J. Scott Applewhite/AP

Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, will shepherd bills on Congress' reaction to the Iran framework deal struck by President Obama.



Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, will shepherd bills on Congress' reaction to the Iran framework deal struck by President Obama.


J. Scott Applewhite/AP


Congress was out of town, and, to some extent, out of the loop when negotiators in Lausanne, Switzerland agreed April 2 on a "framework" for a deal that U.S. officials say would keep Iran from building a nuclear bomb.


As the details for a final deal get worked out before a June 30 deadline, the White House would just as soon see Congress stay on the sidelines. After all, administration officials argue, this is an executive agreement, not a treaty — so it needs no approval by the legislative branch of government.


Not surprisingly, the Republicans in charge of Congress disagree. So do many Democratic members. On Tuesday, the day after Congress returns, that disagreement will be on full display when the Senate Foreign Relations Committee debates and votes on a bill titled "Iran Nuclear Agreement Act of 2015."


That bill is no small order. For starters, it instructs President Obama that he has five days "after reaching an agreement with Iran relating to the nuclear program of Iran" to submit the text of that agreement to the appropriate congressional committees.


There's more. Obama must also include what's called a "verification assessment report" to be prepared by his chief negotiator, Secretary of State John Kerry. That document would have to detail how much Kerry can verify Iran's compliance with the terms of the agreement.


The president would also have to submit an assessment of the adequacy of safeguards meant to insure Iran does not pursue making a nuclear bomb. Beyond that, Obama would have to certify to Congress — within five days of an agreement being reached — that it details all the terms regarding Iran's nuclear activities, as well as any sanctions to be waived by the U.S., other nations, and the United Nations.


All of which raises a question: to which "agreement" does this bill refer? Is it the framework reached in Lausanne, an agreement Obama compared on NPR to signing a contract on a house, but with appraisal, inspection and mortgage details yet to be worked out before the deal is closed?


The president clearly sees that document as a work in progress.


"The devil is in the details," Obama told NPR's Steve Inskeep, "and over the next two to three months, we are going to be in a very tough series of negotiations to make sure that the mechanisms we've set in place actually work."


The bill being put to a vote by the Senate Foreign Relations panel is mute on which agreement — preliminary or final — it addresses. But staffers with both Republicans and Democrats on the committee are categorical: the legislation, they tell NPR, is about a final agreement.


That is, one that likely would not be reached until the end of June.


"There will be no congressional action on the bill itself," one top aide said, "until after a final agreement has been reached."


Only then would a 60-day congressional review period called for in the bill begin — a period during which the president would be barred from waiving any sanctions while Congress debates and votes on the final agreement.


If lawmakers vote to support it or end up not voting, Obama would then be free to waive executive sanctions and those congressional sanctions that provide for a presidential waiver. If Congress votes against the agreement, and if it's able to muster two-thirds majorities in both chambers to override a presidential veto, no sanctions could be waived — which would doom any nuclear deal.


It's not clear just when such a vote might take place. If Congress sticks to the proposed 60-day timetable for acting on the agreement, it would, at the most, have only four weeks before the August recess begins.


And those 60 days would have expired by the time it returns in September. The length of the congressional review period could still be changed, of course. But everything suggests there may be a lengthy period of congressionally generated uncertainty following any final nuclear deal.


Before then, Congress appears certain to vote on the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act — it has broad bipartisan support. But as one GOP aide puts it, "This is not a vote on the nuclear deal itself. It's a vote on what Congress will do once there is a deal."


And while Congress lacks the legal authority to reject that deal by itself, its power to withhold sanctions relief for Iran means that, for the White House, Capitol Hill no longer can be relegated to the sidelines.



Rand Paul Hopes To Court Young, Libertarian Vote In Presidential Bid



Audio for this story from All Things Considered will be available at approximately 7:00 p.m. ET.





NPR's Audie Cornish talks to NPR's Domenico Montanaro about where Rand Paul fits in the Republican field of contenders for president in 2016 and the issues that bolster his appeal to young people.



Hillary Whiskey Glasses? The Campaign Shops Are Open



Hillary Rocks! logo glasses are being sold by the Ready for Hillary PAC for $25.i



Hillary Rocks! logo glasses are being sold by the Ready for Hillary PAC for $25. Ready for Hillary PAC hide caption



itoggle caption Ready for Hillary PAC

Hillary Rocks! logo glasses are being sold by the Ready for Hillary PAC for $25.



Hillary Rocks! logo glasses are being sold by the Ready for Hillary PAC for $25.


Ready for Hillary PAC


When Sen. Rand Paul announced his bid for the White House on Tuesday morning on his website, it came complete with swag fit for a presidential campaign.


"Political fashion is boring. Rand fashion is cool," the website reads, accompanied by a photo of Paul in sunglasses. Available on his site: an eye chart (he's an ophthalmologist) spelling out "Dr. Rand Paul for President," a woven blanket depicting Paul and copies of the Constitution signed by Paul. That last one will cost you a weighty $1,000.


Sen. Ted Cruz, who announced his candidacy two weeks ago, hasn't quite gotten aboard the swag train. A spokeswoman told the New York Times that the Cruz campaign hopes to open its online store soon.


Of course, the Democratic side doesn't have any major declared candidates yet, but the Ready for Hillary PAC has a stocked shop.


And the fashion isn't stopping with the candidates — the Republican National Committee and Democratic National Committee are all in, too.


Here's some of the most creative swag we've seen so far:



Upcoming British Election May Determine Welfare State's Fate



Audio for this story from All Things Considered will be available at approximately 7:00 p.m. ET.





British voters will go to the polls in one month in an election that may determine the future of the British welfare state. Prime Minister David Cameron will face Labour Party leader Ed Miliband.



Rand Paul Vows To 'Take Our Country Back' In Presidential Candidacy Speech



Audio for this story from All Things Considered will be available at approximately 7:00 p.m. ET.





Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul announced his candidacy for president Tuesday in Louisville, Ky. In a speech to supporters, Sen. Paul vowed to "take our country back."



Lebanon PM condoles visiting Spanish king over peacekeeper death


BEIRUT: Prime Minister Tammam Salam Tuesday offered his condolences to Spanish King Felipe VI over the death of a Spanish U.N. peacekeeper killed by Israeli shelling in Lebanon in January.


Salam’s condolences were offered during a meeting with the Spanish king in the Grand Serail two days after a confidential Spanish military report on the death of the Spanish U.N. peacekeeper said that his position was deliberately targeted by Israeli forces.


The premier voiced his gratitude for Spanish participation in UNIFIL’s peacekeeping mission along Lebanon’s southern border with Israel.


The 10,000-strong UNIFIL force includes some 600 Spanish soldiers and troops from 35 other nations.


Salam lauded efforts undertaken by Spanish peacekeepers who he said “have succeeded in forging the best of ties with south Lebanon residents.”


A statement released by the premier's media office said that talks focused on “general issues of interest to the Lebanese government and the Spanish Kingdom,” as well as bilateral relationship between the two states.




Comments


Your feedback is important to us!


We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.


Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.


Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)


comments powered by Disqus


Debate: Has The President Exceeded His War Powers Authority?



Deborah Pearlstein, an expert on national security law and the separation of powers, says commencing war is a power bestowed upon Congress, not the president.i



Deborah Pearlstein, an expert on national security law and the separation of powers, says commencing war is a power bestowed upon Congress, not the president. Samuel LaHoz/Intelligence Squared U.S. hide caption



itoggle caption Samuel LaHoz/Intelligence Squared U.S.

Deborah Pearlstein, an expert on national security law and the separation of powers, says commencing war is a power bestowed upon Congress, not the president.



Deborah Pearlstein, an expert on national security law and the separation of powers, says commencing war is a power bestowed upon Congress, not the president.


Samuel LaHoz/Intelligence Squared U.S.


President Obama has launched a sustained, long-term military campaign against the Islamic State, also known as ISIS or ISIL. But did he have constitutional power to do so?


Article I of the Constitution gives some war powers to the Congress — namely, the power to declare war — while Article II gives the president the power of commander-in-chief. But the U.S. Congress has not declared war since World War II, even as the nation has engaged in numerous military actions across the globe in the intervening decades.


Obama contends that U.S. drone attacks in Pakistan and Yemen, bombing in Libya and airstrikes on ISIS do not require a declaration of war. Proponents of his position argue that an Authorization for the Use of Military Force, passed by Congress in 2001, empowers the president to use deadly force against ISIS today.


But critics of these military actions believe the president has overreached. They argue that the president has the power to wage war without congressional authorization only when it is required to stop an actual or imminent threat to the United States. The threat posed by ISIS, they argue, does not currently rise to that level.


At the latest event from Intelligence Squared U.S., two teams faced off over these issues while debating the motion, "The President Has Exceeded His Constitutional Authority By Waging War Without Congressional Authorization." In these Oxford-style debates, the team that sways the most people to its side by the end is the winner.


Before the debate, 27 percent of the audience at the Miller Theatre at Columbia University voted in favor of the motion, with 33 percent opposed and 40 percent undecided. After the debate, 38 percent approved of the motion and 53 percent were against, making the team arguing against the motion the winner of the debate.


Those debating:


FOR THE MOTION


Gene Healy is a vice president at the Cato Institute. His research interests include executive power and the role of the presidency, as well as federalism and over-criminalization. He is the author of False Idol: Barack Obama and the Continuing Cult of the Presidency and The Cult of the Presidency: America's Dangerous Devotion to Executive Power, and editor of Go Directly to Jail: The Criminalization of Almost Everything. Healy has appeared on PBS' Newshour and NPR's Talk of the Nation, and his work has been published in Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, Chicago Tribune, Legal Times and elsewhere. Healy holds a bachelor's from Georgetown University and a J.D. from the University of Chicago Law School.


Deborah Pearlstein joined the faculty of the Cordozo School of Law at Yeshiva University in 2011, following her tenure at Princeton's Law and Public Affairs Program at the Woodrow Wilson School, and visiting appointments at the University of Pennsylvania Law School and Georgetown University Law Center. Her research focuses on national security law and the separation of powers, and her work has appeared widely in law journals and the popular press. Pearlstein has repeatedly testified before Congress and on law and counterterrorism, and in 2009 was appointed to the ABA's Advisory Committee on Law and National Security. She also served as the founding director of the Law and Security Program at Human Rights First. Before embarking on a career in law, Pearlstein served in the White House as a senior editor and speechwriter for President Clinton. A Harvard Law graduate, she clerked for Judge Michael Boudin of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit and Justice John Paul Stevens of the U.S. Supreme Court.


AGAINST THE MOTION



Yale law professor Akhil Reed Amar, with debate partner Philip Bobbitt, argues that the authorization to use military force against al-Qaida, passed by Congress in 2001, applies to the president's current military actions against ISIS.i



Yale law professor Akhil Reed Amar, with debate partner Philip Bobbitt, argues that the authorization to use military force against al-Qaida, passed by Congress in 2001, applies to the president's current military actions against ISIS. Samul LaHoz/Intelligence Squared U.S. hide caption



itoggle caption Samul LaHoz/Intelligence Squared U.S.

Yale law professor Akhil Reed Amar, with debate partner Philip Bobbitt, argues that the authorization to use military force against al-Qaida, passed by Congress in 2001, applies to the president's current military actions against ISIS.



Yale law professor Akhil Reed Amar, with debate partner Philip Bobbitt, argues that the authorization to use military force against al-Qaida, passed by Congress in 2001, applies to the president's current military actions against ISIS.


Samul LaHoz/Intelligence Squared U.S.


Akhil Reed Amar is Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale University, where he teaches constitutional law. Amar, a graduate of Yale College and Yale Law school, joined the Yale faculty in 1985 after clerking for Judge Stephen Breyer, U.S. Court of Appeals, 1st Circuit. Along with Dean Paul Brest and professors Sanford Levinson, Jack Balkin and Reva Siegel, Amar is the co-editor of a leading constitutional law casebook, Processes of Constitutional Decisionmaking. He is also the author of several books, including The Constitution and Criminal Procedure: First Principles, The Bill of Rights: Creation and Reconstruction, America's Constitution: A Biography, and most recently, America's Unwritten Constitution: The Precedents and Principles We Live By.


Philip Bobbitt is Herbert Wechsler Professor of Federal Jurisprudence at Columbia Law School, the director of its Center for National Security and a distinguished senior lecturer at the University of Texas. One of the nation's leading constitutional theorists, his interests comprise constitutional law, international security and the history of strategy. He has published nine books, including Terror and Consent. He served as law clerk to the Hon. Henry J. Friendly, 2nd Circuit; associate counsel to the President; the counselor on international law at the U.S. Department of State; and senior director for strategic planning at the National Security Council, among other posts. Bobbitt is a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, a life member of the American Law Institute and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, the Pacific Council on International Policy and the International Institute for Strategic Studies. He also serves on the Commission on the Continuity of Government.



The Arab world is Iran's new 'Great Satan': Future bloc


BEIRUT: Tehran’s animosity towards the United States has been replaced with hostility towards Arabs, the Future bloc said Tuesday.


“[Iran] used to consider the U.S. to be the Great Satan and [considered] a deal with America to be a great betrayal," read a statement released by the bloc after their weekly meeting.


“Today [Iran] is defending its agreement with the Great Satan and has shifted its attack onto Arabs..., especially Saudi Arabia.”


Commenting on nuclear talks between Tehran and world powers, the bloc said that it welcomed any step that would clear the Middle East of weapons of mass destruction. But it noted that there was a need to incorporate a change to Iran’s regional policy in any agreement reached with Western powers.


“Iran must stop exporting sectarian strife and storms of fanaticism and [end] its dreams of empire,” the statement read. It should move on to playing a positive role based on a respect of sovereignty, and international law and friendly ties with neighboring countries.


The bloc lauded remarks made Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi last week, in which he said that securing the Bab al-Mandab access to the Red Sea off Yemen's coast is a top priority for Egypt's national security.


These remarks serve to show that the Saudi-led intervention against Houthi rebels in Yemen is an expression of an Arab will to confront Iranian expansion in region, the bloc said.


The bloc also called for the swift release of Lebanese truck drivers who were kidnapped by Syrian rebels at the Nasib crossing on the Syrian-Jordanian border last week, saying that the abduction served the interests of the Syrian regime and “enemies of the Syrian people.”


The crossing was taken over by Syrian rebels last Wednesday, one day after it was shut from the Jordanian side over security concerns.


Blocking the crossings is expected to deal a heavy blow to the Lebanese economy which depends on the crossing for the export of products to Syria, Jordan and other parts of the region.


The bloc called for the provision of alternative sea routes that would allow farmers to sell their products.



EDL worker electrocuted in north Lebanon


Army arrests 22 Syrians in north Lebanon


Military intelligence raids Syrian refugee locations in north Lebanon, as part of measures for tightening security...



Syria envoy to Lebanon says US changing attitude to Damascus


Rebels kill eight Iran soldiers on Pakistan border


Eight Iranian border guards have been killed in a clash with Sunni rebels who had infiltrated from neighboring...



Information minister knocks Tele Liban for airing Nasrallah interview


North Lebanon man killed fighting alongside Syria rebels


A young Lebanese man fighting with Syrian rebels has been killed in Qusair, a source close to the family said Tuesday.



5 Things You Should Know About Sen. Rand Paul



Sen. Rand Paul examines a patient's eyes in his Bowling Green, Ky., office in 2010. Paul, an opthamologist, worked on his father's campaign while in medical school.i



Sen. Rand Paul examines a patient's eyes in his Bowling Green, Ky., office in 2010. Paul, an opthamologist, worked on his father's campaign while in medical school. Joe Imel/AP hide caption



itoggle caption Joe Imel/AP

Sen. Rand Paul examines a patient's eyes in his Bowling Green, Ky., office in 2010. Paul, an opthamologist, worked on his father's campaign while in medical school.



Sen. Rand Paul examines a patient's eyes in his Bowling Green, Ky., office in 2010. Paul, an opthamologist, worked on his father's campaign while in medical school.


Joe Imel/AP


Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul is expected to announce his bid for the White House Tuesday in Louisville. The 52-year-old former ophthalmologist's Libertarian roots set him apart from the expansive field of Republican hopefuls, most notably in foreign policy and issues like defense spending.


His father Ron Paul, also a physician, gained notoriety in the late-1980s as a presidential nominee for the Libertarian party, but there are signs the younger Paul is moving more mainstream Republican.


Here are five things you may not know, or remember, about Paul:


He doesn't have a bachelor's degree


Paul holds a medical degree from Duke University, but he was a few courses shy of earning a bachelor's degree from Baylor University. The Kentucky senator was enrolled at Texas Christian College, where he studied biology and English, from fall 1981 to summer 1984. He left the program after receiving his acceptance to medical school. At the time, Duke did not require a bachelor's degree for admittance, but the policy has since changed.


A fact-check conducted by the Washington Post revealed two instances on the same day in February where Paul stated that he held degrees in Biology and English. A spokesman for the senator later argued to the paper that a medical degree is a biology degree.


He worked on his father's presidential campaign while attending medical school


Despite the demanding workload of medical school, Paul worked as a volunteer for his father, Ron Paul's, 1988 Libertarian Party campaign for president. According to The New York Times , the two would hold regular debates during road trips on topics such as foreign policy and military interventions, with Paul taking stances that skewed closer to Republican ideology.


His father's campaign ultimately garnered less than one percent of the vote.


He founded an eye care clinic to aide low-income people


Paul, an ophthalmologist, founded the Southern Kentucky Lions Eye Clinic, which provides free exams and surgeries to those in need, in 1995.


The senator told National Review in 2013 that he has performed more than 100 pro bono surgeries.


"There's a philosophic debate which often gets me in trouble, you know, on whether health care's a right or not," he said at a Q&A at the University of Louisville. "I think we as physicians have an obligation. As Christians, we have an obligation ... I really believe that, and it's a deep-held belief."


He stood on the Senate floor for nearly 13 hours during a filibuster


In March 2013, Paul took the Senate floor for 12 hours and 52 minutes in what Slate called a "(mostly) one-man show" of a filibuster, ahead of a vote to confirm John Brennan as the director of the Central Intelligence Agency. The speech aimed to increase criticism of the Obama administration's drone policy.


Still, the diatribe was just over half the time spent by record-holder Strom Thurmond, the late South Carolina senator, who spoke for more than 24 hours nonstop in opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1957.


He's faced multiple plagiarism accusations


Charges of plagiarism first arose in October 2013 when MSNBC host Rachel Maddow pointed out that a portion of Paul's speech supporting gubernatorial candidate Ken Cuccinelli bore a striking resemblance to the Wikipedia page for the dystopian science fiction film "Gattaca." Speaking against pro-choice advocates, the senator allegedly lifted four lines from the entry.


Buzzfeed later found another similar instance where Paul recited word-for-word text from the Wikipedia entry for the movie "Stand and Deliver" in a June 2013 speech on immigration.


But the most damning incident occurred when The Washington Times ended the senator's weekly column after a review of his work found that he copied a passage from The Week magazine that had been published a week prior.


According to The Washington Times, Paul took some responsibility but mostly blamed the episodes on staff providing him background material that wasn't properly footnoted.



Detainee attempts escape from custody in Baalbek


Sudanese refugees cite mistreatment by UNHCR


“All we wanted was our rights,” Othman, a Sudanese refugee in Lebanon who asked not to use his real name, told The...



Sen. Rand Paul Poised To Announce 2016 Presidential Run


Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., is widely expected to announce that he will seek the 2016 GOP presidential nomination today.


Paul is scheduled to speak around 11:30 a..m. ET Tuesday; he has also released a video that leaves little doubt about his intentions. Its opening line: "On April 7, a different kind of Republican will take on Washington."


We'll update this post with news from Paul's speech.


Paul faces what is likely to be a crowded Republican field for 2016. Although Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, his colleague in the Senate, is the only other Republican to have announced his intention to run for president, Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, Govs. Chris Christie of New Jersey and Scott Walker of Wisconsin, as well as former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, are expected to join the fray.


Polls show Paul in a three-way tie for third place in the 2016 Republican presidential nomination. Bush and Walker lead the most recent average of polls.


Paul, the son of longtime libertarian Republican Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, was elected to the U.S. Senate in 2010 in the Tea Party wave. An ophthalmologist by training, Paul is pitching himself as a "different kind of Republican." When he was first elected, he was seen as candidate whose libertarian ideas, in the words of The Washington Post, "could make him the most unusual and intriguing voice among the major contenders in the 2016 field.




"But now, as he prepares to make his formal announcement Tuesday, Paul is a candidate who has turned fuzzy, having trimmed his positions and rhetoric so much that it's unclear what kind of Republican he will present himself as when he takes the stage."




As he prepared to announce his presidential ambitions, Paul adopted a more muscular defense policy and reached out to religious conservatives (Fore more on the former, you can listen to Paul's interview with NPR's Robert Siegel last September). Nick Gillespie, editor in chief of Reason.com and Reason TV, told NPR's Scott Simon in a recent interview that Paul could be called "libertarian-ish."


"You know, I think he is talking what he believes," he said. "But I think he draws a lot of ideas from his father generally without some of the baggage, to be honest.




"And people are more interested I think now than even a few years ago of being allowed to make more choices that are important in their lives. And you see that reflected in things like the growth in pot legalization and gay marriage. Then at the same time they're very skeptical of government, whether it's a conservative Republican government under Bush or a liberal democratic government under Obama."




Following his rally today in Louisville, Ky., Rand travels to New Hampshire, South Carolina, Iowa and Nevada — the four states where the presidential nominating contests begin.


You can follow more detailed coverage of this story on our It's All Politics blog here.



Lebanon shuts down sweets factory in Bekaa Valley


Lebanon shuts down sweets factory in Bekaa Valley


Lebanon’s health ministry Tuesday shut down a sweets factory in the Bekaa Valley town of Fakha over food safety...



Rand Paul, Can A Libertarian Win The Republican Primary?



Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. walks from the stage after speaking during the Conservative Political Action Conference in February.i



Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. walks from the stage after speaking during the Conservative Political Action Conference in February. Carolyn Kaster/AP hide caption



itoggle caption Carolyn Kaster/AP

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. walks from the stage after speaking during the Conservative Political Action Conference in February.



Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. walks from the stage after speaking during the Conservative Political Action Conference in February.


Carolyn Kaster/AP


Rand Paul is not like other potential presidential candidates.


The Kentucky senator, who is expected to announce his candidacy for the White House Tuesday morning, doesn't fit neatly into the molds of either party.


Socially liberal on issues of crime and punishment — especially when it comes to drug sentencing — against a federal ban on same-sex marriage, and no foreign policy hawk, he's not your prototypical Republican.


A fiscal conservative, but anti-abortion rights, he's certainly no Democrat, either.


"It's time for a new way, a new set of ideas and a new leader," Paul says in a web video, with a heavy metal soundtrack, previewing his soon-to-be presidential campaign.


Paul fits more with Libertarians. And, though he is the scion of the last carrier of the torch of "liberty," he's also not quite his father's Libertarian.


Paul's father, the former congressman Ron, ran for president three times before retiring. The elder Paul, 79, was always regarded as something of a gadfly, an outspoken fresh voice in the Republican primary with an ironic following of young Libertarians.


Though Paul did not win a single state in 2008 or 2012, when measured by Election Day voting percentage, he routinely finished in the top three. In fact, he finished a solid second behind Romney in the critical early state of New Hampshire.



Supporters of Sen. Rand Paul's cheer as he speaks during CPAC.i



Supporters of Sen. Rand Paul's cheer as he speaks during CPAC. Carolyn Kaster/AP hide caption



itoggle caption Carolyn Kaster/AP

Supporters of Sen. Rand Paul's cheer as he speaks during CPAC.



Supporters of Sen. Rand Paul's cheer as he speaks during CPAC.


Carolyn Kaster/AP


But his band of young, engaged and determined Paul-ites proved one thing — they could organize. Ron Paul not only won straw poll after straw poll at the Conservative Political Action Conference and elsewhere, he also won the most delegates in several states, including Iowa. Though Paul finished third in vote total in the Hawkeye State, his campaign engineered what amounted to a takeover of the state Republican Party apparatus.


"He has a number of assets," said Stu Rothenberg, founder of the Rothenberg Political Report. "He has terrific fundraising potential. He has an army of supporters who will run into a burning building to vote for him."


Rand Paul has tried to use those supporters to help build on his father's foundation, reaching out to minority voters with an emphasis on criminal justice reform and to young audiences — like one in New Hampshire last year — with an appeal based on privacy and civil liberties.


"How many people here have a cellphone?" Paul asked. "How many people think it's none of the government's damn business what you do on your cell phone?"


That brought rousing applause.


"If I had to fill a large lecture room at my campus, I would bet a lot that Rand Paul could fill that room with young Libertarian-minded conservatives," said Dante Scala, a political scientist at the University of New Hampshire. "Of that I have little doubt."


Though Rand Paul can fill a room with young Libertarians in similar ways that his father could, he isn't a carbon copy of his dad. Paul has adjusted some of his policies to slightly more fit the mainstream of the GOP.


Paul has emphasized where he agrees with evangelical Christians on gay marriage, telling a group of pastors last month that the First Amendment says keep government out of religion, not religion out of government. And, in moves that show he understands the GOP has returned to its hawkish roots since the rise of the Islamic State militant group, he has changed his tune on Defense spending, proposing $190 billion more for the Pentagon, and the second day of his presidential rollout finds him in South Carolina — in front of the aircraft carrier, the U.S.S. Yorktown.


Those moves toward the mainstream of the party may lose Paul some die-hard Libertarians, but, says David Boaz of the Cato Institute, most Libertarians are thrilled.


"I think Rand Paul is the most Libertarian major presidential candidate that I can remember seeing," said Boaz, who's new book is called, "The Libertarian Mind," "so it tells you that there is a constituency that wants this more Libertarian approach."


Boaz sees Paul's adjustments as necessary and practical.


"Rand Paul is trying to find a balance that reflects his own views and appeals to a plurality and eventually the majority of the party," Boaz said. "To the extent that there is that constituency — skeptical of foreign intervention, skeptical of the surveillance state — he has that market in the Republican Party all to himself. Is it a big enough market? Well, that's what he's about to find out."


Paul's anti-establishmentarian campaign slogan for 2016 will be, "Defeat the Washington Machine; Unleash the American Dream."


That little rhyme invokes the crusading Paul raging against the "security state" on the floor of the U.S. Senate in an old-fashioned, 13-hour filibuster two years ago. But if the goal for Rand Paul in 2016 is to emerge as the anti-establishment alternative to, say, Jeb Bush, Paul has to become more than just the Libertarian candidate, Scala said.


"He has to find a way to be more appealing to the mainstream of New Hampshire Republicans while keeping his appeal to his core vote, which I would describe right now as people who voted for his dad three years ago," Scala said. "That's the trick for Rand Paul."


Paul, like his father's online "Money Bombs," will likely be able to raise enough money to stick around for quite some time in the GOP primary. Analysts like Rothenberg are skeptical he will be able to pull off the improbable and become the Republican nominee, but Rothenberg wonders if Paul is laying the groundwork for a sea change within the party.


"He may be starting a process that down the road will change the Republican Party, will start to bring in some new kind of faces into the Republican Party," Rothenberg said. "And I wouldn't be surprised if in six or 10 years, this is a more Libertarian party."



In NPR Interview, Obama Answers Critics Of Iran Nuclear Framework



Audio for this story from Morning Edition will be available at approximately 9:00 a.m. ET.





Critics of an agreement on Iran's nuclear plan say it would make the world a more dangerous place. President Obama sat down with Steve Inskeep to lay out his argument against those skeptics.



Lebanon arrests 20 suspected of forging travel documents


North Lebanon man killed fighting alongside Syria rebels


A young Lebanese man fighting with Syrian rebels has been killed in Qusair, a source close to the family said Tuesday.