Tuesday, 3 March 2015

Future responds to Hezbollah remarks over presidency


BEIRUT: The Future Movement Tuesday said Hezbollah was attempting to disrupt the presidential election from taking place, citing remarks made by an Hezbollah official the day before.


In a statement issued after their weekly meeting, the Future bloc said comments made by Hezbollah’s politburo chief Sayyed Ibrahim Amin al-Sayyed was a clear indication of Hezbollah’s role in disrupting the presidential election and accused the party of exposing Lebanon to the dangers of political vacuum.


Sayyed held a news conference after his meeting with the Armenian Tashnag Party Monday, where he was asked by reporters why Hezbollah boycotted sessions to elect a president instead for voting for Aoun.


In response, Sayyed said “Aoun didn’t go to Parliament for us to vote for him in the first place.”


“If there was a candidate... then a serious consideration of the presidential issue would be possible only through an understanding with Aoun,” Sayyed said, stressing that Hezbollah would not attend election sessions without making an agreement with the Free Patriotic Movement leader beforehand.


“Hezbollah, in light of this position, has become responsible for pushing Lebanon into higher orders of danger,” the bloc said in response to Sayyed’s remarks.


According to the bloc, Hezbollah, who has backed Aoun as its primary candidate, has the right to stand by its chosen contender, but Sayyed's comments suggest the party is trying to impose this candidate on all of Lebanon.


The bloc called on all lawmakers to attend Parliament sessions and elect a president, to preserve Lebanon's democratic order.


Shifting to issues pertaining to the Beirut airport, the bloc expressed dismay with the delay in appointing a governing body for Lebanese Civil Aviation, saying that the move was necessary to meet new E.U. requirements.


Last week, Public Works and Transportation Minister Ghazi Zeaiter announced that British Airlines was the first European carrier to stop importing goods from Lebanon after the Beirut airport failed to meet new E.U. standards.


The European Union launched a program recently to ensure cargo is screened appropriately in third country airports, issuing a memo to the Public Works and Transport Ministry informing it of the decision to halt the transport stop of goods from Beirut.


Technical reform will not solve the issues facing the airport, the bloc said, stressing on the need to appoint a governing body to supervise Lebanon’s Civil Aviation Authority, consisting of qualified members to manage the sector.


The bloc called for swift reforms to improve the airport’s shipping center and for its cargo station to be equipped with tools to ensure safe shipment.



Debate: Do Liberals Stifle Intellectual Diversity On The College Campus?



Kirsten Powers writes about politics, human rights and faith for USA Today and The Daily Beast.i



Kirsten Powers writes about politics, human rights and faith for USA Today and The Daily Beast. Chris Zarconi/Intelligence Squared U.S. hide caption



itoggle caption Chris Zarconi/Intelligence Squared U.S.

Kirsten Powers writes about politics, human rights and faith for USA Today and The Daily Beast.



Kirsten Powers writes about politics, human rights and faith for USA Today and The Daily Beast.


Chris Zarconi/Intelligence Squared U.S.


There is agreement on both the political left and right that a majority of college professors in the United States are liberal or left-of-center. But do liberals stifle free speech — particularly that of political and social conservatives — on college campuses?


Social conservatives often argue that campuses, as a whole, are generally hostile to views that don't conform to the social and political left. Conservatives and evangelicals are rarely asked to speak at colleges and universities, they argue. And they point to numerous incidents where, when schools have asked conservatives to speak, those invitations have been revoked after clamor from left-leaning students and faculty.


But there are many who disagree with the premise that liberals quash intellectual diversity on college campuses. They argue that criticism is not censorship, but that conservatives too often label it as such. And when speech has been curtailed at colleges, they say, it's far more often by administrators seeking to quell or ward off campus disruption than by left-leaning students and faculty.


In the latest event from Intelligence Squared U.S., two teams faced off on in an Oxford-style debate on the motion, "Liberals Are Stifling Intellectual Diversity On Campus." In these events, the team that sways the most people by the end of the debate is declared the winner.


Before the debate at George Washington University in Washington, D.C., 33 percent of the audience voted in favor of the motion, 21 percent were opposed and 46 percent were undecided. After the debate, 59 percent agreed with the motion, while 32 percent disagreed, making the team arguing in favor of the motion the winner.


FOR THE MOTION


Greg Lukianoff, president of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), is the author of Unlearning Liberty: Campus Censorship and the End of American Debate and Freedom from Speech. He has published articles in The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, The New York Times, Stanford Technology Law Review, The Chronicle of Higher Education and numerous other publications. He is also a blogger for Huffington Post and authored a chapter in the anthology New Threats to Freedom. Lukianoff is a frequent guest on local and national syndicated radio programs, has represented FIRE on national television and has testified before the U.S. Senate about free speech issues on America's campuses. He is a co-author of FIRE's Guide to Free Speech on Campus.



Angus Johnston (left), founder of StudentActivism.net, and Jeremy Mayer, a professor at George Mason University, argue against the motion, "Liberals Are Stifling Intellectual Diversity On Campus."i



Angus Johnston (left), founder of StudentActivism.net, and Jeremy Mayer, a professor at George Mason University, argue against the motion, "Liberals Are Stifling Intellectual Diversity On Campus." Chris Zarconi/Intelligence Squared U.S. hide caption



itoggle caption Chris Zarconi/Intelligence Squared U.S.

Angus Johnston (left), founder of StudentActivism.net, and Jeremy Mayer, a professor at George Mason University, argue against the motion, "Liberals Are Stifling Intellectual Diversity On Campus."



Angus Johnston (left), founder of StudentActivism.net, and Jeremy Mayer, a professor at George Mason University, argue against the motion, "Liberals Are Stifling Intellectual Diversity On Campus."


Chris Zarconi/Intelligence Squared U.S.


Kirsten Powers is a columnist for USA Today and The Daily Beast, where she writes about politics, human rights and faith, and the author of the forthcoming The Silencing: How the Left Is Killing Free Speech. She joined the FOX News Channel in 2004 and currently serves as a rotating panelist on Outnumbered and as a network contributor, providing political analysis and commentary across FOX News's daytime and prime time programming, including Special Report with Bret Baier and FOX News Sunday. She previously served as a columnist for The New York Post, a communications consultant at Human Rights First and for the New York State Democratic Committee, and vice president for international communications at America Online, Inc. From 1993 to 1998, Powers worked as deputy assistant U.S. trade representative for public affairs in the Clinton administration. She began her career as a staff assistant at the Office of President Bill Clinton, on the Clinton/Gore Presidential Transition Team.


AGAINST THE MOTION


Angus Johnston is a historian of American student activism and of student life and culture. An advocate of student organizing, he is the founder of the website StudentActivism.net. He teaches history at the City University of New York, where he received his PhD in 2009 with the dissertation, "The United States National Student Association: Democracy, Activism, and the Idea of the Student, 1947-1978." Johnston is particularly interested in student activism beyond the 1960s, in the history of student government and in the role of students in the university. He regularly participates in scholarly and popular discussions on these topics, and his writing has appeared in several journals and anthologies. He has delivered lectures and workshops on the history of American student activism to undergraduate audiences at colleges across the country. Johnston received his BA in history from Binghamton University.


Jeremy Mayer is an associate professor in the School of Policy, Government, and International Affairs at George Mason University. Most recently, he is the co-author of Closed Minds? Politics and Ideology in American Universities and co-editor of Media Power, Media Politics, 2nd Edition. He has written articles in several journals on topics such as presidential image management, Christian right politics, comparative political socialization and federalism and gay rights, and has offered political commentary to major networks and national newspapers. Previously, Mayer taught at Georgetown University and Kalamazoo College, where he won a campus-wide teaching award. He is a recipient of the Rowman & Littlefield Award in Innovative Teaching for the American Political Science Association, the only national teaching award in political science. He also has studied politics at Oxford, Michigan and Brown.



Praise, Criticism For Netanyahu's Speech


The reaction to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's speech on Iran to a joint meeting of Congress are so far along partisan lines.


House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said she was "near tears" throughout the speech — "saddened by the insult to the intelligence of the United States as part of the P5 +1 nations, and saddened by the condescension toward our knowledge of the threat posed by Iran and our broader commitment to preventing nuclear proliferation."


P5+1 refers to the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council — Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States — and Germany. They are the nations negotiating with Iran over its nuclear program.


Netanyahu, who views views Iran as an existential threat to Israel, called a deal being negotiated with Iran "very bad."


Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., a likely GOP presidential candidate in 2016, said he was "pleased to hear Prime Minister Netanyahu's speech to Congress today, and join him in calling for peace and standing together for our mutual interests. It is important to work together to prevent a nuclear Iran, and the spread of Radical Islam."


Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, another potential GOP presidential candidate, said on Twitter that Netanyahu's message was "powerful."


"Glad he addressed Congress & detailed the dangers a nuclear Iran poses," he said. "Their nuclear program must be stopped."


Some 50 Democrats skipped Netanyahu's speech.



Second north Lebanon baby dies after hospital denies admission


Hezbollah condemns Bader Eid's killing


Hezbollah Tuesday denounced the killing of Bader Eid, the brother of Arab Democratic Party founder Ali Eid, who was...



Lebanon deports French researcher over 'terror links'


BEIRUT: A French expert on Islamist extremism has been deported from host country Lebanon over "terrorist links," a General Security source said.


A senior General Security officer told The Daily Star Tuesday that French Scholar Romain Caillet was deported Sunday for “having links to terrorist organizations,” without providing more details.


Caillet, who had been residing in Lebanon for the last five years, was prevented from re-entering the country after a trip to Morocco, a diplomat at the French Embassy in Beirut told The Daily Star.


The embassy was not informed about the reasons for his deportation, he added, speaking on the condition of anonymity.


The researcher posted on his Twitter account (http://bit.ly/1Cq6FJ6) two tweets in French accusing Hezbollah of being behind the decision to deport him.


"What do they accuse me of? Daring to speak of the influence of Hezbollah and its pro-Iranian allies on all of Lebanon's institutions," he wrote.


"The murderers of researcher Michel Seurat and Rafik Hariri wanted me to leave Lebanon so my work will continue elsewhere."


Seurat was a French sociologist who was kidnapped by the Islamic Jihad Organization, the precursor to Hezbollah, in 1985 along with another hostage. He was announced dead in March 1986 while still in custody.


Hezbollah has also been accused of being behind the 2005 assassination of Hariri, a former premier. The party vehemently denies those charges.


Caillet is a contemporary historian who has worked for seven years with the Middle East French Institute, according to the think tank’s website.


His profile page says the researcher is based in Beirut, and has worked on a Ph.D thesis titled “The new Muhajirun: The emigration of French salafists to the ‘Land of Islam.’”



Hezbollah condemns Bader Eid's killing


Brother of Alawite leader assassinated


The brother of a fugitive Alawite leader died of his wounds Monday after suspected staunch opponents of the Syrian...



After Weeks Of Controversy, Netanyahu Takes The Podium Before Congress


Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is speaking before Congress this morning, in a much anticipated and controversial address. David Greene discusses the speech with NPR's Michele Kelemen.




Copyright © 2015 NPR. For personal, noncommercial use only. See Terms of Use. For other uses, prior permission required.


Copyright © 2015 NPR. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to NPR. This transcript is provided for personal, noncommercial use only, pursuant to our Terms of Use. Any other use requires NPR's prior permission. Visit our permissions page for further information.


NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR's programming is the audio.